What happened to 18 year old Henry Nowak in England should send chills down the spine of every American.
Nowak was stabbed multiple times by Vickrum Digwa, a 23 year old Sikh man, who completely fabricated claims of racism. As Henry lay bleeding to death, body camera footage shows police handcuffing him while Digwa and his family insisted Henry was the aggressor.
A jury later convicted Digwa of murder and rejected the racism allegations that were used to falsely justify the attack.
Today on Stinchfield, we break down why this story has exploded across the United Kingdom and why Americans should pay attention. When accusations of racism become more important than evidence, when identity politics influence decision making, and when authorities are so afraid of being labeled racist that they ignore the facts right in front of them, justice can be turned upside down.
The Henry Nowak case is rapidly becoming a symbol of what many see as the dangerous consequences of race based politics, DEI culture, and institutions that appear more concerned with perceptions than truth. We’ll examine the facts, the fallout, and how the same leftist mindset is taking hold here in the United States.
Democrats in New York State have declared war on the nuclear family after passing a bill designed to kowtow to the radical pro-trans lobby.
As The New York Post reported on Wednesday, the New York State Legislature this week passed legislation that would erase the terms “mother” and “father” from state child custody and parental laws in favor of two woke, gender-neutral terms.
The terms that would be used instead? Gestating parent and non-gestating parent.
This sounds like something straight out of the Babylon Bee.
Sepulveda, a Bronx Democrat who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, claimed the bill was necessary “to be consistent with current statute and case law>
As insane as this attack on the family is, it cannot be discarded as the ramblings of an isolated radical.
This bill passed the New York state legislature with the support of Democrat elected officials.
The radical left is determined to undermine the family. They must destroy it and rebuild it in a trans image.
For years, California has been written off as a political lost cause for conservatives. Not anymore.
The rise of Republican gubernatorial candidate Steve Hilton and the surprising surge of Spencer Pratt in the Los Angeles mayor’s race suggest a shift in the Golden State. Frustrated by crime, homelessness, the high cost of living, and one-party rule, many voters are looking for alternatives.
Hilton’s advance to the general election shows Republican ideas gaining traction even in deep-blue California, while Pratt’s unlikely campaign reflects growing dissatisfaction with the political establishment. What once seemed impossible is now part of the conversation.
Democrats still hold clear advantages in sheer numbers, voting patterns, and the state’s overall political makeup, making any Republican statewide win a steep challenge. But political change starts with momentum, and momentum builds when voters begin seeking alternatives.
Today on Stinchfield, I’ll explain why these races matter beyond California. Is this the start of a political realignment? Are voters rejecting policies they believe have failed? And could Republicans be laying the groundwork for future gains in places once considered unwinnable?
California may not be red yet. But for the first time in a long time, it doesn’t look quite as blue as it once did.
It seems that you cannot throw a rock into a group of leftwing protestors without hitting someone who allegedly commits heinous crimes against children.
The man accused of biting an ICE officer was previously accused of distributing child pornography.
The Gateway Pundit reported,
Acting Attorney General Blanche shared the following after the arrest: “Today @TheJusticeDept charged rioter Brendan John Geier for allegedly kicking and biting ICE officers at Delaney Hall last night. We will not tolerate the vicious attacks on ICE officers we’ve seen in New Jersey the last few days. These riots are clearly not ‘peaceful protests’ as you can see from the photos of these horrific wounds. Assault a federal officer, you’ll be held accountable.”
The Justice Department has confirmed to The New York Post that Geier, of Madison, New Jersey, was previously charged with sexual abuse of children related to the dissemination and possession of child pornography in Pennsylvania.
In 2019, the Berks County District Attorney’s Office shared, “On September 21, 2018, the Berks County Detectives received a complaint from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC.)This complaint involved the possession and uploading of child pornography through “Skype” on September 17, 2018.”
If he is convicted in the case of biting the ICE officer he could do up to 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.
The Los Angeles establishment is in full panic mode. With the election just hours away, reality television star Spencer Pratt is surging, and suddenly, the Hollywood elite are doing everything they can to stop him.
Actors, influencers, activists, and the same political machine that helped turn Los Angeles into a city plagued by crime, homelessness, and urban decay have been dispatched to destroy his candidacy.
But here’s the question nobody is asking: Why do they hate Spencer Pratt so much? Most of his critics can’t even explain it.
They’ve simply been conditioned to reject anyone who challenges the leftist status quo. Independent thought is no longer welcome in Hollywood. Obedience is.
The same crowd that watched Los Angeles spiral into chaos without objection now wants voters to believe Spencer Pratt is the real threat.
Today, we break down what Pratt’s rise says about a city fed up with failed leadership and whether voters are finally ready to reject the political and cultural elites who have run Los Angeles into the ground.
Plus, the battle over immigration enforcement continues to rage. At Delaney Hall in New Jersey, federal authorities are housing individuals accused or convicted of serious crimes while activists, street protesters, and rioters gather outside demanding their release.
Despite claims they’re concerned about conditions inside the facility, these anarchists aren’t interested in reforming detention conditions at all.
Their goal is simple: open the doors and let everyone out.
With nearly all votes counted, right-wing outsider Abelardo de la Espriella and left-wing senator Iván Cepeda emerged as the two finalists, setting up a stark ideological confrontation between a hardline security agenda and a continued peace-and-reform strategy.
#ColombiaElections Right-wing presidential candidate Abelardo de la Espriella outperformed expectations in Colombia’s first-round election, finishing ahead of the left-wing candidate despite polling deficits leading up to the vote. He has campaigned on a tough anti-crime platform… pic.twitter.com/qeSBAg0tOi
— Gateway Hispanic (@GatewayHispanic) June 1, 2026
Colombia is heading into a decisive presidential runoff on June 21 after a tightly contested first round that highlighted deep political polarization, rising insecurity, and growing debate over the direction of the country under outgoing President Gustavo Petro.
Violence Shadows the Campaign
The electoral season has unfolded under unusual levels of political tension and violence.
According to Colombia’s electoral observation authorities, at least 63 incidents of violence—including threats, attacks on campaign offices, vandalism of political materials, and targeted intimidation—were recorded across 21 departments during the campaign period affecting multiple presidential teams, including those of De la Espriella and Cepeda.
In addition, reports from regional media indicate that members of campaign teams have been killed or threatened in separate incidents, prompting increased security measures for candidates and forcing several rallies to be held under heavy protection.
The wave of violence has reinforced concerns that armed groups and criminal organizations are attempting to influence or destabilize the electoral process, a recurring issue in Colombia’s modern democratic history.
Abelardo de la Espriella: Hardline Security Outsider
Abelardo de la Espriella, a 47-year-old lawyer and businessman, enters the runoff as one of the most unconventional candidates in recent Colombian politics.
With no prior elected experience, he built his public profile as a high-profile criminal defense attorney and media personality before entering politics. His campaign has surged on a platform centered almost exclusively on security.
¡Vamos a derrotar la tiranía y el absolutismo!
Pasamos a segunda vuelta gracias a los más de 10 millones de colombianos que respondieron al rugido.
¡En 21 días haremos historia!
Los espero en el cubo de cristal del Malecón del Río, para celebrar juntos esta victoria.
— Abelardo De La Espriella (@ABDELAESPRIELLA) May 31, 2026
De la Espriella proposes a major expansion of state coercive power, including the construction of large-scale prisons, intensified military operations against armed groups, and an end to ongoing peace negotiations with criminal organizations.
Enhorabuena, amigo Abelardo @ABDELAESPRIELLA, por tu gran victoria en primera vuelta de las elecciones presidenciales en Colombia.
Los colombianos tienen en la firmeza y valentía del tigre una oportunidad histórica para que su nación recupere la libertad, la prosperidad y la… pic.twitter.com/mwNsQsqlwc
He has also framed his campaign as a response to what he describes as institutional weakness and policy failures in the fight against drug trafficking and illegal armed groups. His rhetoric has drawn strong support from voters frustrated by persistent violence, but also criticism from human rights advocates who warn of potential democratic and civil liberties risks.
During the campaign, De la Espriella also claimed to have received intelligence warnings about potential assassination attempts, underscoring the heightened security climate surrounding the election.
Iván Cepeda: Continuity of Peace and Reform
Iván Cepeda, a longtime senator and «human-rights advocate», represents the continuity wing of Colombia’s current governing coalition.
Closely aligned with President Gustavo Petro, Cepeda supports ongoing negotiations with armed groups as part of a broader “total peace” strategy aimed at reducing conflict through dialogue and reintegration rather than purely military solutions.
His platform emphasizes structural reforms, including expanded social programs, rural development, and efforts to reduce inequality—issues he argues are the root causes of Colombia’s decades-long internal conflict.
Supporters see him as a defender of long-term peacebuilding and institutional reform. Critics argue that previous negotiation efforts have failed to significantly reduce violence and have allowed armed groups to reorganize and expand.
Petro’s Legacy at the Center of the Election
The election was further overshadowed by controversy after President Gustavo Petro wrote on social media that he did not accept the preliminary vote count (preconteo), arguing that only the official scrutiny process conducted by electoral authorities would determine the final result.
El llamado conteo transmitido no tiene fuerza vinculante. sus datos no son norma pública. Como presidente no acepto los resultados del preconteo de la firma privada de los hermanos Bautista, porque debiendo estar quietos los algoritmos del software de conteo y escrutinios, en la…
Although President Gustavo Petro is constitutionally barred from seeking re-election, his administration remains central to the political debate shaping the runoff.
Petro’s government pursued ambitious reforms in healthcare, labor policy, and environmental regulation, while also prioritizing «peace negotiations» with multiple armed groups. However, his tenure has been marked by persistent security challenges, political polarization, and criticism over the effectiveness of his “total peace” strategy.
The election is widely interpreted as a referendum on whether Colombia should continue Petro’s reform-oriented approach or shift toward a more forceful security-first model.
A Battle for the Political Center
With both candidates mobilizing their bases, the outcome is likely to depend on centrist and undecided voters who did not strongly align with either camp in the first round.
Turnout is expected to play a decisive role, especially given that participation in the first round was lower than anticipated for an election of this magnitude.
Economic concerns, security conditions, corruption, and trust in state institutions are expected to dominate the final weeks of campaigning.
A Defining Moment for Colombia
The runoff between De la Espriella and Cepeda reflects a broader struggle over how Colombia should confront long-standing challenges: armed conflict, inequality, and institutional weakness.
The result will determine not only the country’s political direction but also its approach to peace and security at a time when violence continues to shape public life.
For many voters, the choice is not simply ideological—but a question of which path offers greater stability in an uncertain moment.
Woke Texas state Rep. James Talarico, the Democrat nominee for U.S. Senate, is facing renewed scrutiny over past ridiculous remarks about God, gender, and so-called transgender youth. During a 2021 debate over so-called transgender legislation in the Texas House, Talarico declared on the floor that “God is non-binary,” a line that has since gone viral in conservative media and on social platforms.
In recent interviews with CBS News and ABC News, he has said the phrase was “intentionally provocative” and insisted he meant that God transcends human categories and cannot be confined to human notions of male and female, even though, the bible clearly refers to God the Father, The Son and Holy Spirit as He. To defend that botched view, Talarico has repeatedly cited the Apostle Paul’s letter to the Galatians, saying that in Christ “there is neither male nor female,” and arguing it points to God has no gender.
Conservative commentators and theologians, however, accuse him of twisting Galatians 3:28 and effectively taking issue with Paul’s broader teaching on sex and gender roles, calling the claim that God is non-binary is a form of modern “gender ideology” applied to Scripture.
Separately, in a 2021 discussion of so-called transgender athletes, Talarico argued that “modern science acknowledges six biological variations based on chromosomes,” a comment Republicans now summarize as his believing in “six genders” or “six biological sexes.” He has also drawn attention for saying in an interview clip, “I love trans kids,” a line that Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton mocked in his Senate primary victory speech as “weird” when he told supporters that, asked what he loved beyond family and friends, Talarico’s “first answer was trans kids.”
Paxton’s first general-election ad for his Senate campaign, shared widely as a video on Instagram and other platforms under the tagline “Radical Talarico: too low-T for Texas,” strings together footage of Talarico saying God is non-binary, discussing six sex variations, and promoting vegan campaign purchases to paint him as culturally out of step with Texas. Talarico has responded that Paxton is clipping his “cringey” past comments to distract from what he calls the Republican’s “career of corruption,” while weakly walking back some specifics by affirming that there are two sexes, male and female, and emphasizing that people with chromosomal variations should be treated with dignity and respect.
Sponsor | https://www.purgestore.com | Use promo code DREW for 20% off and support The Gateway Pundit today!
Cringe woke Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wore a red patterned hijab while addressing an Eid al-Adha celebration at Macombs Dam Park in the Bronx on May 27, 2026, standing on stage alongside New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani. Mamdani, New York City’s first Muslim mayor, also wore a kurta styled like Arsenal soccer jersey and told the crowd, “I am honored to be New York City’s first Muslim Mayor and I am determined to lead through solidarity; together, we are working to ensure every New Yorker can afford the groceries, housing, and child care they need.”
Footage and captions from the event describe Ocasio-Cortez as speaking about “solidarity” with Muslim New Yorkers while she delivered brief remarks during the holiday gathering stating followers need to “renew our commitments to one another,” to “bring light into darkness.” In later comments reported by outlets covering the controversy, she defended her decision to wear the headscarf, calling it “the respectful move” toward constituents observing the festival.
Viral clips shared by outlets like show groups of men at the Eid celebration talking among themselves and appearing to ignore the hijab-clad congresswoman as she speaks from the stage. Some commentators highlighted the scene of a largely male audience speaking over her as evidence of a clash between the progressive lawmaker’s feminist branding and gender norms in Muslim doctrine.
On X and Instagram, conservative and anti-woke accounts amplified the video, with one widely shared post quoted in NerdStash reading, “What a fraud! Bought and paid for!” Ynet reported critics mocking Ocasio-Cortez for, in their words, “screaming about patriarchy while cosplaying in a garment mandated by brutal theocracies” as they circulated the clip.
Other viral posts roasted her appearance as “political cosplay” and accused her of “pandering in a hijab” at the event with Mamdani, with one caption declaring, “NY HAS FALLEN” above the footage.
Sponsor | https://www.purgestore.com | Use promo code DREW for 20% off and support The Gateway Pundit today!
For years, California has been written off as a political lost cause for conservatives. Not anymore.
(@Santi_ABASCAL) 
