Anmelden
“National CO2 emissions do not include emissions from: imported goods; the UK’s international investments; UK companies’ overseas factories; nor from international shipping and aviation not allocated to the UK. “These exemptions have […]
The post Net Zero: Premeditated Industrial Destruction (Part 3) first appeared on The Expose.
The liberal Irish government will face a vote of no-confidence amid the spiralling fuel crisis and the widespread farmer-trucker protests.
The post Left-Wing Irish Government Faces No Confidence Vote Amid Farmer Protests Against Fuel Tax appeared first on Breitbart.
President Donald Trump's youngest son Barron Trump is preparing to join the energy drink market with SOLLOS Yerba Mate Inc.
The post VIDEO: Barron Trump’s Florida-Based Drink Company Prepares for Launch appeared first on Breitbart.
Protesters demanding the Irish government slash punishing taxes on farmers are successfully starving the country of fuel.
The post Leftist Irish Government Threatens to Deploy Army Against Farmer-Trucker Anti-Fuel Tax Protest appeared first on Breitbart.
The result of the UK’s pursuit of Net Zero CO2 emissions has been to offshore energy-intensive industrial production at the cost of 100s of thousands of jobs, billions of tax revenues, higher […]
The post Net Zero: Premeditated Industrial Destruction (Part 2) first appeared on The Expose.
The UK has surrendered ability to ensure its own security, leaving it at the mercy of global events, and the PM raging about energy costs.
The post ‘Fed Up’: UK’s Starmer Equates Trump and Putin in National Security Rant appeared first on Breitbart.
The UK is facing an energy crisis that is going to require radical solutions to solve. Many countries are ramping up coal-fired electricity generation in response. Is it time for the UK […]
The post Coal not Cold: UK needs new coal-generated electricity to keep the lights on first appeared on The Expose.
DCNF, Frank Lasee, Gastkommentar, 31. März 2026
Letzte Woche verkündeten Schlagzeilen (New York Times, NPR, CNN), Präsident Donald Trump würde einem französischen Energiekonzern fast eine Milliarde Dollar zahlen, um den Bau von Offshore-Windparks zu stoppen. Die Berichterstattung war klassischer Sensationsjournalismus – irreführend, unvollständig und darauf ausgelegt, ein abgedroschenes Narrativ zu bedienen. Die wahre Geschichte ist weitaus einfacher und vernünftiger.
Am 23. März 2026 erzielte das US-Innenministerium eine Einigung mit TotalEnergies. Die US-Regierung erstattet 928 Millionen US-Dollar – genau den Betrag, den das Unternehmen 2022 an die Biden-Administration gezahlt hatte, als es zwei Offshore-Windparklizenzen vor der Küste von New York/New Jersey und North Carolina erhielt.
Im Gegenzug wird TotalEnergies beide Pachtverträge kündigen und sich formell verpflichten, keine neuen Offshore-Windprojekte in den Vereinigten Staaten zu verfolgen. Das Unternehmen wird das Kapital stattdessen in amerikanische Öl-, Erdgas- und LNG-Projekte investieren.
Das ist keine Unternehmenssubvention. Es handelt sich um eine Rückerstattung bereits gezahlter Gelder, damit zwei teure und unzuverlässige Projekte gestoppt wurden, bevor sie die amerikanischen Stromkunden belasten konnten. TotalEnergies verpflichtete sich außerdem, das Geld in den USA zu behalten und für Öl und Erdgas zu verwenden. Die Schlagzeile hätte lauten sollen:
„Win-Win – Trump bringt das französische Unternehmen TotalEnergies dazu, eine Milliarde Dollar in zuverlässige und bezahlbare amerikanische Energie anstatt in Offshore-Windkraft zu investieren.“
Strom aus Offshore-Windparks ist deutlich teurer als Strom aus Erdgas. Jüngste Analysen der Stromgestehungskosten zeigen, dass neue Offshore-Windprojekte zwischen 100 und 140 US-Dollar pro Megawattstunde kosten – 50 bis 150 Prozent teurer als Strom aus neuen Gas- und Dampfkraftwerken, die typischerweise 60 bis 80 US-Dollar pro Megawattstunde liefern.
Diese Kluft vergrößert sich dramatisch, sobald wir die Realität berücksichtigen.
Wind ist unbeständig. Wenn der Wind nicht weht, muss der Strom von woanders herkommen. Offshore-Winde im Atlantik wehen je nach Standort etwa die Hälfte der Zeit. Das bedeutet entweder den Bau und die Wartung teurer Batteriespeichersysteme oder das Bereithalten von Gaskraftwerken als Reserve. Die doppelten Kosten – einmal für die bedarfsgerechte Gasversorgung und ein weiteres Mal für die nur zeitweise verfügbare Offshore-Windenergie – werden in den positiven Schlagzeilen über Offshore-Windkraft selten erwähnt. Das ist teuer.
Trump versteht diese grundlegende wirtschaftliche Realität ganz klar. Warum sollte man massive Investitionen in teure, wetterabhängige Energiequellen tätigen, wenn unsubventionierte Erdgas- und Erdölprojekte günstigeren, bedarfsgerechten Strom und höhere Renditen liefern? Der einzige Grund für diese unkluge wirtschaftliche Entscheidung ist die Klimaideologie. Konventionelle Energiequellen bieten nach wie vor deutlich höhere Gewinne ohne die endlosen Steuergelder, die für die Förderung von Offshore-Windparks benötigt werden. Deshalb ist die Umleitung dieser fast eine Milliarde Dollar in das profitablere, unsubventionierte amerikanische Erdgas ein Gewinn für das Unternehmen und die USA.
TotalEnergies hätten diese Investition überall auf der Welt tätigen können, aber die Amerikaner denken an Ihre eigenen Arbeitzplätze, sie verhandeln, dass die Gelder im eigenem Land bleiben und zur amerikanischen Energiedominanz beitragen. [Was hätte wohl die Deutsche Regierung verhandelt? – Der Übersetzer]
Der größte Erfolg dieses Deals ist nicht die Rückerstattung selbst, sondern die endgültige Streichung dieser beiden Pachtverträge. TotalEnergies hat sich nun verpflichtet, in den USA keine Offshore-Windparks mehr zu bauen. Das ist ein direkter Gewinn für zuverlässigen und bezahlbaren Strom und ein klares Signal dafür, dass die Ära teurer Ökostromauflagen zu Ende geht.
Sogar einige Demokraten beginnen, diese Wahrheit einzugestehen. Die demokratische Gouverneurin von New York, Kathy Hochul (die wiedergewählt werden will), schlug kürzlich vor, wichtige Bestimmungen des Klimaschutzgesetzes des Bundesstaates zu verschieben. Sie verschob die Regeln zur Reduzierung von Treibhausgasen und räumte ein, dass die ursprünglichen Zeitpläne „kostspielig und unerreichbar“ geworden seien.
Wenn selbst das tiefblaue New York stillschweigend auf die Bremse tritt, sollte der Rest des Landes aufmerksam werden. Jahrelang wurde uns erzählt, Wind- und Solarenergie seien billig und würden unsere Strompreise senken. In Wirklichkeit verteuert deren Ausbau die Strompreise – ähnlich wie ein zusätzliches, unzuverlässiges Auto, das nur gelegentlich genutzt wird, die Kosten für Ratenzahlung, Wartung und Versicherung erhöht, ohne das zuverlässige Auto, das man ständig nutzt, zu ersetzen.
Die Weigerung der Mainstream-Medien, dies korrekt darzustellen, ist aufschlussreich. Anstatt eine pragmatische Entscheidung anzuerkennen, die Verbraucher vor höheren Rechnungen und Netzinstabilität schützt, stellten viele Medien die Geschichte so dar, als würde Trump fossile Brennstoffe gegenüber „grüner Energie“ bevorzugen, indem er Steuergelder für den Aufkauf von TotalEnergies ausgab, anstatt die Gebühr zurückzuerstatten, die TotalEnergies für den Verkauf überteuerter, subventionierter Teilzeitstrom gezahlt hatte.
In Wirklichkeit handelte es sich um eine unkomplizierte Geschäftstransaktion: Die Leasingraten wurden zurückerstattet, die Projekte abgebrochen und das Kapital in funktionierende Energiequellen fließen gelassen.
Zuverlässiger und bezahlbarer Strom ist kein parteipolitischer Luxus, sondern eine wirtschaftliche und nationale Sicherheitsnotwendigkeit. Indem die Trump-Regierung die ursprünglichen Leasingzahlungen zurückerstattete und Investitionen weg von teuren Offshore-Windparks umleitete, erzielte sie einen klaren Gewinn für amerikanische Familien, Unternehmen und die Energiesicherheit.
Frank Lasee ist leitender politischer Analyst bei CFACT. Er war ein ehemaliger Senator des US-Bundesstaates Wisconsin und ehemaliges Mitglied der Regierung von Gouverneur Scott Walker.
Die in diesem Kommentar geäußerten Ansichten und Meinungen sind die des Autors und spiegeln nicht die offizielle Position der Daily Caller News Foundation wider.
Alle Inhalte der Daily Caller News Foundation, einem unabhängigen und überparteilichen Nachrichtendienst, stehen seriösen Medienunternehmen mit großer Reichweite kostenlos zur Verfügung. Alle wiederveröffentlichten Artikel müssen unser Logo, den Namen des/der jeweiligen Reporters/Reporterin und dessen/deren Zugehörigkeit zur DCNF enthalten. Bei Fragen zu unseren Richtlinien oder einer möglichen Partnerschaft kontaktieren Sie uns bitte unter [email protected].
Der Beitrag Trumps „Milliarden-Dollar-Geschenk“ ist in Wirklichkeit eine Rückerstattung, um Offshore-Windparks zu stoppen erschien zuerst auf EIKE - Europäisches Institut für Klima & Energie.
Cuba’s government released more than 2,000 prisoners as the island faces mounting economic pressure linked to U.S. sanctions and worsening fuel shortages.
The Cuban Embassy in Washington said authorities granted pardons to 2,010 inmates under provisions of the country’s constitution, citing factors such as good behavior, time already served and health conditions.
"This humanitarian and sovereign gesture was based on a careful analysis of the nature of the offenses committed by the inmates, their good conduct while in prison, [and] the fact that they had served a significant portion of their sentences," the embassy said in a statement posted on X.
RUSSIA SHIPS FUEL TO CUBA USING 'SPOOFING' TACTIC CHALLENGING TRUMP EMBARGO: REPORTS
Officials said those released include young people, women, older adults, as well as foreign nationals and Cuban citizens who live abroad but were imprisoned on the island.
The government said it excluded prisoners convicted of serious crimes, including murder, sexual assault, violent robbery, drug offenses and corruption of minors, as well as repeat offenders.
CUBA'S ENTIRE ELECTRICAL GRID COLLAPSES, LEAVING WHOLE ISLAND WITHOUT POWER
The move marks the second prisoner release this year and comes during Holy Week, which Cuban officials described as a customary period for such actions.
The release comes as Cuba grapples with a deepening economic and energy crisis driven in part by a renewed pressure campaign from the Trump administration aimed at cutting off the island’s access to foreign oil. The restrictions have contributed to widespread fuel shortages, blackouts and growing unrest across the country.
WATCH: Cuban power blackout sparks protests as Trump hints at US intervention
President Donald Trump has threatened tariffs on any country that sends oil to Cuba and has pressured nations such as Mexico to halt shipments as part of a broader effort to squeeze the island’s energy supply.
The U.S. also allowed a tanker to deliver fuel to Cuba earlier this week after months of severe shortages, with the White House framing the move as a humanitarian exception rather than a shift in policy.
Trump has also escalated his rhetoric, recently saying "Cuba’s next" while discussing U.S. actions abroad, though he later sought to downplay the remark.
The deepening crisis has also sparked protests and clashes across the island.
Cuba has been under communist rule since Fidel Castro’s 1959 revolution, and is now led by President Miguel Díaz-Canel, who succeeded Raúl Castro in 2018.
Oklahoma needs to ensure affordable and reliable electricity to attract data centres and other energy-hungry businesses, while keeping costs low for residents. The state should prioritise energy sources like natural gas, which […]
The post For economic investment and growth, Oklahoma needs affordable, reliable power, not wind and solar energy first appeared on The Expose.
The Iranian regime has demanded that vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz comply with its new laws. So which countries are affected the most? In 2025, Statista named the Strait of […]
The post Asia is the primary destination for oil and gas transported through the Strait of Hormuz first appeared on The Expose.
The world is experiencing the start of a new lockdown – this time related to energy use with the International Energy Agency (“IEA”) playing a key role, similar to the role the […]
The post Energy lockdowns begin first appeared on The Expose.
Recently, radical depopulationist and energy authoritarian Paul Ehrlich died. Shortly after, Robert L. Bradley Jr. wrote a series of articles reminding us why his death was good news, but perhaps a little […]
The post Civil libertarians, not only economic libertarians, should be concerned about the likes of Paul Ehrlich first appeared on The Expose.
The Iranian regime is charging some tankers $2 million to pass through the Strait of Hormuz in a bid to further its control over the global shipping choke point, according to reports.
Iranian lawmaker Alaeddin Boroujerdi told state broadcaster Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB) on Sunday that the massive toll marks the start of a new approach to controlling the waterway, Iran International reported.
"Collecting $2 million as transit fees from some vessels crossing the strait reflects Iran’s strength," Boroujerdi said during a television program cited by Iranian media.
The member of parliament’s national security committee also said the measure has already been implemented and reflects what he called a new "sovereign regime" in the strait after decades, the outlet said.
"Now, because war has costs, naturally we must do this and take transit fees from ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz," he said.
Boroujerdi’s comments came after President Donald Trump warned Saturday that the United States could target Iran’s power infrastructure if the strait is not reopened within 48 hours.
NATO HEAVYWEIGHTS BALK AT HORMUZ MISSION AS TRUMP WARNS ALLIANCE AT RISK
"If Iran doesn’t FULLY OPEN, WITHOUT THREAT, the Strait of Hormuz, within 48 hours from this exact point in time, the United States of America will hit and obliterate their various POWER PLANTS, STARTING WITH THE BIGGEST ONE FIRST!" Trump said in a post shared on Truth Social.
The strait is "open to everyone" except Iran’s adversaries, Tehran’s permanent representative to the International Maritime Organization, Ali Mousavi, also told the Mehr News Agency on Sunday, while Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian also set out Iran’s policy on X.
"The Strait of Hormuz is open to all except those who violate our soil," he said.
TRUMP’S STRAIT SHOWDOWN: FIVE BOLD MOVES TO CRUSH THE IRAN THREAT NOW
According to Lloyds List, Iran has set up a de facto ‘safe’ shipping passage in the Strait of Hormuz and is offering vetted tankers passage in exchange for approval — and in "at least one case, a reported $2m payment," it said.
Several governments, including China, India, Pakistan, Malaysia and Iraq are in talks with Tehran over ship transit, as Iran’s Revolutionary Guard sets up a new system to register "approved" vessels for safe passage, the outlet reported.
OIL, GAS PRICES JUMP AS TRUMP FLIRTS WITH STRIKING IRANIAN OIL INFRASTRUCTURE
Maritime intelligence firm Windward AI reported Sunday that Strait of Hormuz traffic was "near collapse", with only "16 AIS-visible crossings recorded over the past seven days."
Transit is controlled increasingly stringently, with vessels rerouting via Iran's territorial waters, the firm said, noting that Gulf energy exports continue to decline, with crude and LPG flows at recent lows.
"Iranian exports remain active, supported by alternative routing and sustained on-water volumes," Windward said.
The strait normally handles about 20 million barrels of oil per day and roughly 20% of global liquefied natural gas trade. The closure has driven up shipping and insurance costs, pushed oil prices higher, and raised global economic concerns.
Russian crude volumes remain elevated, reinforcing continued reliance on maritime energy transport, Windward said.
Politicians who cut “renewable energy” subsidies saved the USA’s power grid by incentivising reliable generation which was having its operating revenue looted by subsidised, unreliable solar and wind. “The politicians who cut […]
The post “Renewable energy” subsidies were destroying America’s energy freedom; a handful of politicians stopped the subsidies and saved the grid first appeared on The Expose.
There is no single “international gas price” as BBC journalist Fiona Bruce claimed. This is not the only dubious claim she made. She also claimed that UK natural gas would be “sold […]
The post No BBC, there is no “international gas price” – and yes, drilling in the North Sea would give the UK gas security first appeared on The Expose.
The current “renewable” energy policy is in a head-on collision with physics. The physics of gradient, density and land use are the starting point for understanding why, writes Richard Lyon. Chapter 1: […]
The post “Renewable” energy policies can’t work – because of physics first appeared on The Expose.
The US has a long history of fighting for oil, dating back to World War I. Indeed, securing oil supplies was a major factor in many 20th-century wars, Dr. Vernon Coleman writes. […]
The post Wars that are fought over oil first appeared on The Expose.
Cuba plunged into an unprecedented blackout after its entire electrical grid suddenly suffered a total collapse on Monday, briefly leaving roughly 10 million residents in total darkness.
"At 1:54 p.m. local time, there was a disconnection of the national electrical grid resulting in a complete power outage across Cuba which includes the Havana metropolitan area," the U.S. Embassy in Cuba said.
The nationwide outage comes just two days after a large crowd of protesters, fed up with the island's energy crisis, were caught on camera attacking a local Communist Party headquarters in Cuba, ransacking the building and attempting to set it on fire.
Efforts to restore electricity are currently underway across the island, with reports indicating that power is slowly returning to some areas.
"The causes are being investigated and protocols for restoration are beginning to be activated," the Ministry of Energy and Mines of Cuba said Monday afternoon, referring to the island’s disrupted National Electrical System of Cuba.
Cuba’s electrical grid has grown increasingly unstable over the years due to aging infrastructure, fuel shortages, and economic restrictions that have limited the country’s access to energy resources – including Washington’s long‑standing oil embargo and recent U.S. actions that disrupted Venezuelan fuel shipments, a key source of the nation's energy.
Power outages have become a frequent occurrence across the country, disrupting water supply, refrigeration and communications.
"Officials in the US gov must be feeling very happy by the harm caused to every Cuban family," Cuban Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs Carlos F. de Cossio said in response to Monday’s blackout.
MILLIONS LOSE POWER ACROSS CUBA AS TRUMP SANCTIONS CONTINUE TO FUEL ONGOING ENERGY CRISIS
Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel said Friday that no fuel has entered the country for the past three months. Since then, electricity generation has relied heavily on a "considerable contribution from renewable energy sources."
The total collapse of the power grid came just as officials announced updates to their solar panel project in Villa Clara, describing it as a "national security necessity" amid ongoing restrictions on fossil fuel imports under the Trump administration.
"Amid a context of severe energy constraints and a recurring economic lockdown, #Cuba takes another firm step towards electric sovereignty," the Villa Clara Electric Company said Monday morning.
"This connection comes at a critical time: Washington maintains severe restrictions on our country's access to fossil fuels, funding and technology. Betting on renewables isn’t just environmental — it’s a national security necessity."
As the island continues to face rolling power outages, residents have been urged to brace for significant disruption and unplug all nonessential equipment, "leaving only essential devices powered on until service stability is restored," the Villa Clara Electric Company said.
Last Saturday, in a rare display of public dissent driven by frustration over widespread blackouts, anti-government protesters in Cuba reportedly targeted a Communist Party office by hurling rocks, shouting "liberty" and igniting large fires at the scene.
The rally, caught on video, began peacefully in the city of Morón late Friday but escalated into violence within hours, Reuters reported, citing local sources.
Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for comment.
Reuters contributed to this report.
Kharg Island, which handles the bulk of Iran’s crude exports and was once floated by President Donald Trump as a potential target could spark broader regional instability and attacks on energy infrastructure if struck by the U.S., a leading energy security expert has warned.
Reports indicate the Trump administration is weighing options that could include a direct attack on Kharg Island.
Discussing the possibility of boots on the ground amid Operation Epic Fury on "The Claman Countdown," retired Army Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt also told Liz Claman striking Kharg could be in the "offing."
"I don't think a significant number of boots on the ground, other than the chance of an assault on Kharg Island, is in the offing," he said March 9.
TRUMP IS REALIGNING WORLD ENERGY MARKETS, AND THE IRAN STRIKES ARE ACTUALLY HELPING
Trump’s interest in the island dates back to a 1988 interview in which he reportedly suggested targeting Kharg in response to Iranian aggression, according to reports.
"I’d be harsh on Iran. They’ve been beating us psychologically, making us look like a bunch of fools," Trump said. "One bullet shot at one of our men or ships, and I’d do a number on Kharg Island. I’d go in and take it."
Sara Vakhshouri, a global energy analyst, said striking Kharg aligns squarely with Washington’s "energy dominance" doctrine and spoke as U.S. and Israeli military action in Iran rattles energy markets and disrupts oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz.
"Kharg currently acts as a strategic restraint point in the conflict," Vakhshouri, founder and president of SVB Energy International, told Fox News Digital.
"Interrupting Iran’s main export terminal would likely trigger a major oil price spike, market instability and regional retaliation against energy infrastructure."
TRUMP SAYS IT’S AN ‘HONOR’ TO KEEP STRAIT OF HORMUZ OPEN FOR CHINA AND OTHER COUNTRIES
Kharg’s significance is not only tactical but strategic, she added, arguing that it fits squarely within Trump’s long-touted doctrine.
The policy, central to Trump’s first term, prioritized maximizing U.S. oil and gas production, expanding exports and leveraging U.S. energy strength as a geopolitical tool.
"But when we talk about Kharg, the most important factor is that it fits within the U.S. energy dominance concept," Vakhshouri said, suggesting that holding the island in reserve as a pressure point — rather than immediately striking it — may be a more strategic option.
Kharg sits in the northern Persian Gulf, roughly 15 miles off Iran’s mainland. Tankers leaving the terminal pass through the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow choke point that handles about one-fifth of global oil trade.
KEANE WARNS IRAN STRIKE BECOMING ‘REGIONAL WAR,' SAYS THREE GULF STATES PREPARING FOR COMBAT
Around 90% to 95% of Iran’s crude and petroleum exports pass through Kharg, making it the regime’s primary oil revenue hub.
"Roughly 15 to 20 million barrels may be in storage, with around 1.5 to 3 million barrels per day exported through the terminal during the sanctions, with export capacity up to 5 million barrels per day," Vakhshouri said.
"If the export capability from Kharg were lost, this restraint could diminish, shifting the risk toward further strikes on regional energy facilities and, more importantly, prolonged disruption of oil flows and tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz," she warned.
"Putting a price ceiling on such a scenario would depend largely on Iran’s retaliatory actions," Vakhshouri added.
"The certain outcome, however, would be prolonged volatility and uncertainty in the market, driven by fears of further retaliation or an extended cycle of disruption."
Fox News Digital has reached out to the White House for comment.
Yesterday, a year after he struck the deal with Beijing, Ed Miliband, the UK’s Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, finally published his Memorandum of Understanding with China. What […]
The post Ed Miliband signs deal with China to invest in British energy that threatens national security first appeared on The Expose.
There are two basic theories for the origin of crude oil: biotic and abiotic. The origin of petroleum or natural gas may seem like a strange debate to have but determining whether […]
The post The Great Oil Conspiracy: It has been known since the end of WWII that oil is not a fossil fuel; it is abiotic first appeared on The Expose.
During an interview in 1994, L. Fletcher Prouty spoke about what petroleum is. It isn’t what we think it is. It isn’t a fossil fuel. And it is the second most prevalent […]
The post L. Fletcher Prouty: Oil is not a fossil fuel; it is the second most prevalent liquid on Earth first appeared on The Expose.
“It is time to end the cover-up and misinformation that has prevented the American public from knowing the truth about oil – that hydrocarbon fuels are abiotic in nature, produced by the […]
The post The Great Oil Conspiracy: The Conclusion first appeared on The Expose.
As the years have progressed, the estimates of oil and gas reserves in the US have dramatically risen. Estimates change over time due to technological advances and other factors, which the “peak […]
The post The Great Oil Conspiracy: An overview of Chapter 6 first appeared on The Expose.
In this chapter, Jerome Corsi details the early days of what is now called “renewable energy.” Several expensive large windfarms and solar projects proved a failure during the Obama administration’s “green energy” […]
The post The Great Oil Conspiracy: An overview of Chapter 5 first appeared on The Expose.
Ignoring that oil and natural gas are hydrocarbons that are produced abiotically and assuming the fossil fuel account, Jerome Corsi challenges the global reserve estimates used by peak production theorists. He does […]
The post The Great Oil Conspiracy: An overview of Chapter 4 first appeared on The Expose.
M. King Hubbert invented the theory of “peak oil.” This running-out-of-oil scare is based on the idea that oil is a fossil fuel and the supply is finite. But this is not […]
The post The Great Oil Conspiracy: An overview of Chapter 3 first appeared on The Expose.
