President Donald Trump announced Monday that the United States and India have reached a trade agreement and that India has committed to stop buying Russian oil.
The post Trump: India Agrees to Stop Buying Russian Oil, Enter Trade Deal with U.S. appeared first on Breitbart.
The United States and India reached a trade agreement that will immediately lower American tariffs on Indian goods to 18 percent while opening India's market to U.S. energy and other products, President Donald Trump announced Monday.
The post U.S. Will Cut Tariffs on India to 18% in Trade Deal appeared first on Breitbart.
Senior Kremlin security official Dmitry Medvedev said in remarks released for publication on Monday the world is getting very dangerous and needs to calm down, adding Russia is an oasis of sanity and does not want a global conflict.
The post Russia’s Medvedev Says ‘We’re Not Crazy’ and Calls for Global Calm appeared first on Breitbart.
A Russian drone strike hit a bus carrying miners in Ukraine’s Dnipropetrovsk region on Sunday, killing at least 12 people.
Ukrainian emergency services later reported the death toll had risen to 15 in one of the deadliest single attacks on energy workers since the start of the war.
The attack Sunday came a few hours after President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced a new round of peace talks between Ukraine and Russia had been postponed.
A spokesperson for DTEK, Ukraine’s largest private energy firm, which employed the workers, told Fox News Digital that drones had targeted the bus as it traveled "roughly 40 miles from the front line in central and eastern Ukraine."
The DTEK spokesperson also described the incident as a "terrorist attack on civilian infrastructure."
"This strike was a targeted terrorist attack against civilians and another crime by Russia against critical infrastructure," the spokesperson added.
RUSSIA UNLEASHES MAJOR DRONE, MISSILE ATTACK ON UKRAINE AS US DIPLOMATIC TALKS CONTINUE
The bus was transporting miners after the end of their shift when it was hit by a Russian drone, the State Emergency Service of Ukraine also confirmed.
At least seven workers were injured, and a fire sparked by the impact was later extinguished by emergency crews.
"The epicenter of one of the attacks was a company bus transporting miners from the enterprise after a shift in the Dnipropetrovsk region," the company also said in a statement.
Zelenskyy condemned the strike late Sunday, calling it another deliberate attack on civilians.
Earlier in the day, he announced that the next round of trilateral talks involving Ukraine, Russia and the U.S. would now take place Feb. 4-5 in Abu Dhabi, after originally being expected for Sunday.
"Ukraine is ready for a substantive discussion, and we are interested in ensuring that the outcome brings us closer to a real and dignified end to the war," Zelenskyy said on X, adding that the delay had been agreed to by all sides.
The delay followed a surprise meeting Saturday in Florida between Steve Witkoff, President Donald Trump’s special envoy, and Kirill Dmitriev, the Kremlin’s special envoy and head of Russia’s sovereign wealth fund.
The talks in Abu Dhabi are now expected to include representatives from Ukraine, Russia and the U.S., according to The Associated Press.
UKRAINE RACES TO BOLSTER AIR DEFENSES AS PUTIN’S STRIKE PAUSE NEARS END
Meanwhile, Zelenskyy warned Russia is stepping up its aerial campaign against civilian and logistical targets.
"Over the past week, Russia has used more than 980 attack drones, nearly 1,100 guided aerial bombs, and two missiles against Ukraine," he wrote on X on Sunday. "We are recording Russian attempts to destroy logistics and connectivity between cities and communities."
In a statement, DTEK CEO Maxim Timchenko also explained the bus attack marked the company’s "single largest loss [of] life of DTEK employees since Russia's full-scale invasion."
"We can already say with certainty that this was an unprovoked terrorist attack on a purely civilian target, for which there can be no justification," Timchenko said.
The attack marked "one of the darkest days in our history," he added. "DTEK teams are working with emergency services on the ground in Dnipropetrovsk region to ensure the injured, and families who have lost loved ones, get all the care and support they need. Their sacrifice will never be forgotten," he added.
Verwandte Tags
KYIV, Ukraine (AP) – A Russian drone strike on the Ukrainian city of Dnipro hit a bus carrying mineworkers and killed 15 people, Ukrainian emergency services said Sunday, hours after President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced that the next round of peace
The post Russian Drone Strike Kills 15 on Ukraine Bus as More Talks Scheduled for Next Week appeared first on Breitbart.
A top Kremlin official praised President Donald Trump as an effective leader seeking peace in Ukraine, saying Moscow views renewed talks with Washington as productive.
Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chairman of Russia’s Security Council and a former president, said Trump is genuinely trying to end the war in Ukraine and wants to be remembered as a peacemaker.
"Trump wants to go down in history as a peacemaker — and he is really trying," Medvedev said in an interview with Reuters. "And that is why contacts with Americans have become much more productive."
Trump has repeatedly said a peace deal to end the war is close. U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff said during a Cabinet meeting Thursday that he had "productive and constructive meetings" with Russian special envoy Kirill Dmitriev as part of the Trump administration's ongoing effort to end the Russia-Ukraine war.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced Sunday that a new round of talks involving Ukraine, the United States and Russia will take place this week in Abu Dhabi. His announcement comes as Russia has intensified attacks on Ukraine’s energy and logistics infrastructure, worsening conditions for civilians as winter temperatures plunge.
Medvedev dismissed speculation that Trump is secretly aligned with Moscow, telling the outlet that Americans elected him and Russia respects that choice. He also praised Trump for standing up to the U.S. political establishment and said his blunt, sometimes "brash" style is misunderstood.
"He is an emotional person, but on the other hand, the chaos that is commonly referred to, which is created by his activities, is not entirely true," Medvedev said. "It is obvious that behind this lies a completely conscious and competent line."
Medvedev told the outlet that Trump’s background as a businessman shapes his approach, joking that there is no such thing as a former businessman, an echo of a well-known Russian saying about former KGB agents.
Medvedev, a hardliner within Russia’s leadership, has frequently warned of nuclear escalation since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. He has stressed that avoiding further conflict remains the priority, but still expects Russia to achieve military victory in Ukraine.
"I would like this to happen as soon as possible," Medvedev said of ending the conflict. "But it is equally important to think about what will happen next. The goal of victory is to prevent new conflicts."
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced Sunday that a new round of talks involving Ukraine, the United States and Russia will take place this week, as Kyiv presses for progress toward ending the war while Moscow continues strikes across the country.
Writing on X, Zelenskyy said the meetings are scheduled for Wednesday and Thursday in Abu Dhabi.
"Ukraine is ready for a substantive discussion, and we are interested in ensuring that the outcome brings us closer to a real and dignified end to the war," Zelenskyy wrote.
The announcement comes as Russia has intensified attacks on Ukraine’s energy and logistics infrastructure, worsening conditions for civilians as winter temperatures plunge.
Ukrainian officials say Moscow has repeatedly targeted power grids, heating and water systems throughout the nearly four-year war, a campaign Kyiv has described as an effort to use winter conditions as a weapon against the civilian population.
Authorities warned that Ukraine is facing one of its coldest stretches of the season, with temperatures in some areas expected to fall as low as minus-22 degrees Fahrenheit, according to Ukraine’s State Emergency Service.
President Donald Trump said late last week that Russian President Vladimir Putin had agreed to temporarily halt strikes on Kyiv and other cities amid the extreme cold.
ZELENSKYY SAYS US SECURITY GUARANTEES DOCUMENT IS '100% READY' FOR SIGNING
"I personally asked President Putin not to fire on Kyiv and the cities and towns for a week during this… extraordinary cold," Trump said during a Cabinet meeting at the White House, adding that Putin had "agreed to that."
The White House has not provided details on the timing or scope of the pause, and Ukrainian officials have expressed skepticism about Russia’s intentions.
Zelenskyy said Thursday that key obstacles to a peace agreement remain unresolved, including the future of occupied Ukrainian territory and Moscow’s demands for land it has not captured.
Russia struck Ukrainian energy facilities in several regions on Thursday, Zelenskyy said, though he noted that no such strikes occurred overnight. He added that Russian drones and missiles have continued to hit residential areas and logistics hubs across Ukraine.
Trump has described Putin’s acceptance of a pause as a concession, but Zelenskyy questioned whether Moscow is genuinely interested in ending the war as the invasion approaches its fourth anniversary on Feb. 24.
"I do not believe that Russia wants to end the war. There is a great deal of evidence to the contrary," Zelenskyy said Thursday.
U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff said he had "productive and constructive meetings" with Russian special envoy Kirill Dmitriev as part of the Trump administration's ongoing effort to end the Russia-Ukraine war.
"We are encouraged by this meeting that Russia is working toward securing peace in Ukraine and is grateful for [the president's] critical leadership in seeking a durable and lasting peace," Witkoff wrote on X.
During a Cabinet meeting Thursday, Witkoff said progress had been made and that there had been "lots of good things happening between the counterparties discussing the land deal."
"I think the people of Ukraine are now hopeful and expecting that we're going to deliver a peace deal sometime soon," Witkoff added.
TRUMP SAYS PUTIN AGREED TO HALT KYIV STRIKES FOR ONE WEEK AMID BRUTAL COLD
The meetings were held Saturday in Florida, according to Witkoff, and included Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent; Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner; and White House senior advisor Josh Gruenbaum. Witkoff and Kushner have been two of the key players from the Trump administration not only in the Russia-Ukraine deal, but also others, including the Israel-Gaza peace plan.
Witkoff, Kushner and Gruenbaum also met with Putin earlier this month in Moscow shortly after the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. After the meeting in Moscow, Witkoff, Kushner, Gruenbaum and other U.S. representatives met with negotiators from Ukraine and Russia. The talks were said to be constructive despite obstacles to peace remaining.
"A lot was discussed, and it is important that the conversations were constructive," Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy wrote on X. "As a result of the meetings held over these days, all sides agreed to report back in their capitals on each aspect of the negotiations and to coordinate further steps with their leaders."
ZELENSKYY TOUTS ‘CONSTRUCTIVE’ TRILATERAL TALKS BETWEEN THE US, RUSSIA AND UKRAINE IN ABU DHABI
Nearly four years after Russian President Vladimir Putin's invasion, Ukrainians are facing a brutal winter, and Russian strikes on Kyiv's energy resources have made conditions worse. However, President Donald Trump said Thursday at his Cabinet meeting that Putin had agreed to a temporary pause in targeting Kyiv and other places in the region experiencing the frigid weather.
"And because of the cold, extreme cold — they have the same that we do — I personally asked President Putin not to fire on Kyiv and the cities and towns for a week," Trump said, adding that Putin had "agreed to do that." The president classified the weather in the region as being "record-setting cold."
Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov confirmed Friday that Trump had made the request for Putin to stop targeting Kyiv until Feb. 1 "in order to create favorable conditions for negotiations," The Associated Press reported. The outlet noted it was odd that the Kremlin spokesperson mentioned Feb. 1, as it would mean it was only a two-day pause. Additionally, the AP reported that the cold weather forecast is expected to get worse after Sunday.
Russia and Ukraine will hold another round of peace negotiations in Abu Dhabi Sunday, according to The Kyiv Independent. However, it is unclear whether the U.S. will participate in the talks.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Ukraine is racing to reinforce its air defenses as a brief pause in Russian strikes on Kyiv and other cities approaches its expiration, and military and diplomatic experts warn the move may do little to change conditions on the battlefield and could ultimately strengthen Moscow’s negotiating position.
Earlier Friday, President Donald Trump said at the White House, "I think we’re getting very close to getting a settlement," expressing optimism about the upcoming Russia-Ukraine talks. "Zelenskyy and Putin hate each other, and it makes it very difficult, but I think we have a good chance of getting it settled."
The Kremlin said President Vladimir Putin agreed to a personal request from Trump to halt airstrikes on Kyiv until Feb. 1 to create what it described as favorable conditions for negotiations. Ukrainian officials stressed there is no formal ceasefire.
TRUMP SAYS PUTIN AGREED TO HALT KYIV STRIKES FOR ONE WEEK AMID BRUTAL COLD
As temperatures in Kyiv are expected to plunge to minus-26 degrees Celsius beginning Sunday, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Ukraine is moving to strengthen short-range air defenses against drones to protect frontline cities in the south and northeast.
"Protection against Russian drones must be reinforced in our cities, such as Kherson and Nikopol, as well as in the border communities of the Sumy region, where the Russians have essentially set up an ongoing ‘safari’ against civilians," Zelenskyy said on Telegram.
Despite the pause, Russian lawmakers and regional leaders have publicly urged escalation. Russian parliament speaker Vyacheslav Volodin said deputies are calling for the use of more powerful "weapons of retribution," while Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov said he opposed negotiations altogether.
Against that backdrop, experts told Fox News Digital the pause appears far more symbolic than transformative.
Vice Adm. Robert S. Harward, a retired Navy SEAL and deputy commander of U.S. Central Command, said the halt in strikes reflects political signaling rather than a military shift.
PUTIN CALLS TRUMP’S PEACE PLAN A ‘STARTING POINT’ AS HE WARNS UKRAINE TO PULL BACK OR FACE 'FORCE'
"It’s symbolic in the sense of the dialogue and where we are in the negotiations," Harward told Fox News Digital. "President Trump wants to illustrate to the U.S. that his relationship with Putin delivers results. This is a validation of that relationship, which could be an indicator of where the overall negotiations are on ending the war."
Carrie Filipetti, executive director of the Vandenberg Coalition and a former senior State Department and U.S. Mission to the United Nations official, said Russia’s agreement should not be misread as a move toward peace.
"While I am certain that Ukrainian civilians welcome any brief pause, they also aren’t holding their breath because Putin’s war machine will not stop until his calculus is changed on the risks of continuing his war," Filipetti said.
She added that the short duration of the pause leaves Ukraine exposed.
"Given how short the pause is and the duplicity of Russia saying it agreed to a week-long pause that expires in two days, this does not meaningfully change any conditions on the battlefield," she said.
Harward said Ukraine could face diplomatic consequences once the pause expires.
"The risk to Ukraine is that this further weakens and isolates their role and position in the negotiations," he said.
Zelenskyy has also warned that Ukraine’s ability to defend civilians has been strained by delays in Western funding. He said European allies delayed payments under the PURL weapons purchase program, leaving Ukraine without Patriot air defense missiles ahead of recent Russian strikes that knocked out power across parts of Kyiv.
"This is a critical issue for protecting civilians and Ukrainian cities and Ukraine’s energy infrastructure during the brutally cold winter months," Filipetti said. "As President Zelenskyy has said, there will be no electricity and therefore no heat for civilians if they don’t have enough Patriot missiles to defend against Russia’s ballistic missiles."
Harward noted that the problem extends beyond Ukraine.
"Air Defense has been in high demand globally, considering the threats from Russia and China," he said. "Resources, expenses and the increased time to deliver and implement the capabilities add to the challenge."
On whether the pause could open the door to broader de-escalation, both experts expressed caution.
"This tactical pause only serves to reinforce Russia’s negotiating position," Harward said. "Putin is showing the world that he is willing to listen and respond. In return, he’ll want more support of his position and demands."
"Only time will tell," Filipetti said. "Diplomacy can always appear fruitless until there is a real deal. If this short pause, delivered by President Trump's continued engagement and pressure on Putin, can be used to build additional progress in the trilateral talks, that would be a very positive outcome."
Reuters contributed to this report.
A new report is warning that the combined war casualties in the nearly four-year Russia-Ukraine war could hit 2 million by spring 2026. The number includes soldiers killed, injured or missing on both sides of the conflict.
The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) released a report on Tuesday predicting the grim milestone. CSIS states that Russia suffered 1.2 million casualties, including 325,000 troop deaths, between February 2022 and December 2025. It estimates that Ukraine suffered between 500,000 to 600,000 casualties, including 140,000 troop deaths. CSIS estimates that the current combined Russian and Ukrainian casualties could be as high as 1.8 million.
Getting a clear picture of the fatalities and casualties suffered on both sides is not easy as neither Moscow nor Kyiv gives timely data on military losses, according to The Associated Press, which noted that the two countries are also simultaneously focused on amplifying each other's casualties. Russia has publicly acknowledged the deaths of just over 6,000 soldiers, the AP reported.
The outlet noted that activists and independent journalists have said that reports of military losses have been repressed in Russian media.
ZELENSKYY TOUTS ‘CONSTRUCTIVE’ TRILATERAL TALKS BETWEEN THE US, RUSSIA AND UKRAINE IN ABU DHABI
"Despite claims of battlefield momentum in Ukraine, the data shows that Russia is paying an extraordinary price for minimal gains and is in decline as a major power," the report reads.
"No major power has suffered anywhere near these numbers of casualties or fatalities in any war since World War II," the report notes.
Russian battlefield casualties and fatalities have been "significantly higher" than Ukraine's, according to the report.
CSIS estimates the ratio to be roughly 2.5:1 or 2:1. CSIS points to several reasons for the high Russian casualties and fatalities, including the country's "failure to effectively conduct combined arms and joint warfare, poor tactics and training, corruption, low morale and Ukraine’s effective defense-in-depth strategy in a war that favors the defense." The report also states that Russia has accepted taking high casualties as part of its strategy.
"Russia’s attrition strategy has accepted the costs of high casualties in hopes of eventually wearing down Ukraine’s military and society," CSIS states in its report.
ZELENSKYY SAYS US SECURITY GUARANTEES DOCUMENT IS '100% READY' FOR SIGNING
In addition to its high casualty rate, Russia has also been advancing "remarkably slowly," according to the report. CSIS stated in its report that Russian forces had advanced at an average rate of 15 to 70 meters (49 to 230 feet) per day in its most prominent offenses since seizing the military initiative in January 2024. The authors of the report say Russia's pace is "slower than almost any major offensive campaign in any war in the last century."
The report comes less than one month before the fourth anniversary of Russia invading Ukraine. Despite international mediators, including the U.S., making attempts to end the war, it has persisted, with both sides suffering casualties.
On Wednesday, Ukrainian officials said two people were killed during Russian strikes that hit an apartment block on the outskirts of Kyiv, the AP reported. Additionally, at least nine people were injured in separate attacks on the Ukrainian cities of Odesa and Kryvyi Rih.
Representatives for Ukraine, Russia and the U.S. recently met in the United Arab Emirates for the first trilateral talks since 2022. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in a post on X that the "conversations were constructive."
"A lot was discussed, and it is important that the conversations were constructive," he wrote on X, noting the delegations could have further meetings as early as next week. "As a result of the meetings held over these days, all sides agreed to report back in their capitals on each aspect of the negotiations and to coordinate further steps with their leaders."
Fox News Digital reached out to Russia and Ukraine's foreign affairs ministries.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Russian attack drones struck a civilian passenger train in the Kharkiv region on Tuesday, killing at least four people in what he called an "act of terrorism."
"In any country, a drone strike on a civilian train would be regarded in the same way – purely as an act of terrorism. There would be no doubt about the classification, neither in Europe, nor in America, nor in the Arab world, nor in China, nor anywhere else," he wrote in a post on X. "There is, and can be, no military justification for killing civilians in a train carriage."
The Kharkiv Regional Prosecutor's Office said Wednesday on Telegram that the number of confirmed fatalities had risen to five, with two people injured and one man reported missing.
Oleksiy Kuleba, Ukraine’s deputy prime minister, said three Russian drones were used in the attack on the train, which was carrying more than 200 people.
ZELENSKYY SAYS FRESH RUSSIAN ATTACK ON UKRAINE SHOWS PUTIN'S 'TRUE ATTITUDE' AHEAD OF TRUMP MEETING
Eighteen passengers were inside the carriage hit by one of the drones, he added.
The attack followed trilateral talks between Moscow, Kyiv and Washington in Abu Dhabi over the weekend that were aimed at ending the nearly four-year war.
U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff said the meetings were "very constructive" and plans were being made for the sides to meet again this week.
RUSSIA, UKRAINE TO DISCUSS TERRITORY AS TRUMP SAYS BOTH SIDES 'WANT TO MAKE A DEAL'
"President Trump and his entire team are dedicated to bringing peace to this war," Witkoff said.
Russia has continued to strike Kyiv’s energy infrastructure during negotiations, leaving thousands of residents without power and heat as winter conditions persist.
Zelenskyy said significant outages remain across the region, with hundreds of residential buildings in three districts of the capital still without heating despite ongoing repair efforts.
"Repair crews are working at maximum capacity. Crews from almost across the entire country have been deployed to assist," he noted.
Russia criticized the U.S.’ proposed Golden Dome missile defense system Monday, warning it could destabilize global nuclear deterrence, according to reports.
According to TASS, Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev told Kommersant newspaper that the ambitious project is extremely "provocative."
"Problems in the strategic sphere resulting from destabilizing U.S. actions only continue to grow. It is enough to recall the highly provocative anti-missile project ‘Golden Dome for America,’" he said, TASS reported.
"It fundamentally contradicts the assertion of the inseparable interrelationship between offensive and defensive strategic arms, which, by the way, was enshrined in the preamble of New START," Medvedev added, citing the treaty that protects U.S. national security by placing limits on Russia’s deployed intercontinental nuclear weapons.
A defense expert says Russia’s reaction underscores the Golden Dome’s power as a geopolitical signal to the world.
"Even before it has been built, the dome is military focused and politically focused and an incredible bargaining chip with U.S. adversaries," defense expert Cameron Chell told Fox News Digital.
"In this case, it is Russia and China in particular, in terms of how the U.S. postures for negotiating peace terms, treaty terms and whether the U.S. will be negating their already existing arsenal," the Draganfly CEO claimed.
The Golden Dome is a long-term missile defense concept aimed at protecting North America from ballistic, cruise and hypersonic missile threats.
Chell spoke after the Pentagon released its National Defense Strategy on Jan. 23, outlining a renewed focus on homeland defense, expanded missile defense, counter-drone systems, cyber capabilities and long-range strike forces.
The planned Golden Dome missile defense shield is designed to defeat "large missile barrages and other advanced aerial attacks," the strategy said, while also hardening military and key civilian infrastructure against cyber strikes as Russia and China continue expanding their hypersonic weapons programs.
'GOLDEN DOME' MISSILE SHIELD TO BE TESTED BY TRUMP IN KEY AMERICAN TERRITORY
As previously reported by Fox News Digital, China has also pushed back against the Golden Dome missile defense initiative, accusing Washington of undermining global strategic stability and risking the weaponization of outer space.
"There’s big value in the talk and the build-out of Golden Dome, even long before it gets built, not to mention the research and technology development that comes out of it," Chell said.
"The posturing and the economic benefits of building something like this are also factored into why the dome is so important."
The project’s sheer scale is expected to drive its strategic impact but could also come with an enormous price tag.
"The dome is going to take trillions to build and is the largest military project, probably the largest engineering and technology project ever attempted, so there are going to be challenges getting it done," Chell explained.
"The U.S. has ten years of planning, including where they are going to have communication links, radar systems, and early warning systems." That planning, Chell noted, is shifting focus north.
GERMANY WARNS RUSSIA COULD ATTACK NATO BY 2029 AS INTELLIGENCE THREAT ASSESSMENTS MOUNT
"In order to protect the U.S., you want to take things down before they get over the top of the country," Chell said.
"Places like Canada, or even further north, become the dropping ground. You want to get these threats as soon as possible."
Canada and Greenland are viewed by U.S. defense planners as critical for radar coverage, space tracking and early-warning infrastructure.
"The idea is something being shot down from space, but to do that you need very detailed landscape data of the entire North and you need access to the North," Chell said.
President Trump has long argued the U.S. must control Greenland for national security reasons, citing its strategic Arctic location and natural resources.
"There needs to be infrastructure and oversight in the far north, in Canada, in Greenland, and places like that," Chell said. "All that planning has to be done well ahead of time, before we have anything operational."
Chell also pointed to the potential role of drones in supporting the Golden Dome’s broader mission.
"Drones could be part of informing the Golden Dome as reconnaissance, surveillance and intelligence tools," he said, adding that the "entire military complex is integrated."
Fox News Digital has reached out to the Department of War for comment.
Verwandte Tags
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said that a long-anticipated document on U.S. security guarantees is "100% ready" for signing, with Kyiv now waiting for its American partners to confirm the date and place before the agreement moves to ratification in both the U.S. Congress and the Ukrainian parliament.
"For us, security guarantees are first and foremost guarantees of security from the United States. The document is 100% ready," Zelenskyy said Sunday at a joint press conference in Vilnius, Lithuania, with the presidents of Lithuania and Poland, according to a translation of his remarks from Reuters.
Zelenskyy reiterated at the press conference that Ukraine views membership in the European Union as another core security guarantee and is aiming to join the bloc by 2027, the Ukrainian president's office said in a statement on its website.
His remarks come after Ukraine, Russia and the United States held trilateral talks in Abu Dhabi for two days over the weekend.
PUTIN CALLS TRUMP’S PEACE PLAN A ‘STARTING POINT’ AS HE WARNS UKRAINE TO PULL BACK OR FACE 'FORCE'
Zelenskyy said on X that the discussions, which involved political and military representatives from all three sides, were "constructive" and focused on potential parameters for ending his country's war with Russia.
RUSSIA LAUNCHES LARGEST ATTACK ON UKRAINE THIS MONTH FOLLOWING TRUMP'S MEETING WITH PUTIN, ZELENSKYY
The talks in the United Arab Emirates followed a meeting in Moscow on Thursday between Russian President Vladimir Putin, U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff, President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner and head of the Federal Acquisition Service Josh Gruenbaum.
Putin aide Yuri Ushakov said the "extremely frank" discussions lasted roughly four hours and included U.S. officials updating Moscow on their recent conversations with Ukrainian and European leaders, according to a summary of the meeting from the Kremlin.
Territorial issues remain a key obstacle in the negotiations, with Moscow pressing Kyiv to relinquish parts of eastern Ukraine’s Donbas region that Russian forces do not fully control.
U.S. officials told Axios that negotiations examined the full range of unresolved issues, from Russia’s territorial demands in the Donbas to control of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant and potential steps to prevent a return to fighting.
Another U.S. official told the outlet a second round of talks is scheduled to take place on Feb. 1.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Saturday described recent trilateral talks between the United States, Russia and Ukraine in Abu Dhabi as "constructive," saying the meetings marked the first format of their kind in some time and focused on potential parameters for ending Moscow’s war.
Zelenskyy said the talks, which were hosted by the United Arab Emirates over two days, involved political and military representatives from all three sides and addressed security-related issues, including the need for American monitoring and oversight.
"A lot was discussed, and it is important that the conversations were constructive," he wrote on X, noting the delegations could have further meetings as early as next week. "As a result of the meetings held over these days, all sides agreed to report back in their capitals on each aspect of the negotiations and to coordinate further steps with their leaders."
The Abu Dhabi talks followed a meeting in Moscow on Thursday between Russian President Vladimir Putin, U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff, President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner and Josh Gruenbaum, the head of the Federal Acquisition Service.
RUSSIA ALLEGES ATTACK ON PUTIN RESIDENCE AS UKRAINE DENIES CLAIM AHEAD OF TRUMP TALKS
Putin aide Yuri Ushakov said the "extremely frank" discussions lasted roughly four hours and included U.S. officials updating Moscow on their recent conversations with Ukrainian and European leaders.
"Importantly, the participants in the conversation between the President of Russia and the Americans reaffirmed the fact that bringing about a lasting settlement would be unlikely without addressing the territorial issue based on the formula as agreed in Anchorage," Ushakov said, according to a summary of the meeting from the Kremlin.
Territorial issues remain a key obstacle in the negotiations, with Moscow pressing Kyiv to relinquish parts of eastern Ukraine’s Donbas region that Russian forces do not fully control.
RUSSIA, UKRAINE TO DISCUSS TERRITORY AS TRUMP SAYS BOTH SIDES ‘WANT TO MAKE A DEAL’
The diplomatic efforts come as Russia continues its strikes across Ukraine, targeting the country’s energy sector, critical infrastructure and residential areas.
UKRAINE-RUSSIA AT A CROSSROADS: HOW THE WAR EVOLVED IN 2025 AND WHAT COMES NEXT
Zelenskyy said on Sunday that Russian forces launched more than 1,700 attack drones, over 1,380 guided aerial bombs and 69 missiles in the past week alone.
The European Commission, the EU’s executive body, said ahead of the trilateral talks that it was deploying 447 emergency generators to help restore power to hospitals, shelters and critical services, as more than one million Ukrainians face outages amid freezing temperatures.
"The EU will not let Russia freeze Ukraine into submission and will continue helping Ukrainians get through this winter," the commission said.
The U.S., Russia and Ukraine are meeting in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE), to discuss one of the major sticking points stopping a deal to end the nearly four-year war: territorial disputes. The talks in Abu Dhabi are the first trilateral talks since 2022.
The trilateral sit-down comes after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's meeting with Trump in Davos and Russian President Vladimir Putin's meeting with Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and the president's son-in-law, Jared Kushner.
Witkoff and Kushner traveled to the UAE for the talks after their meeting with Putin in Moscow on Thursday.
ZELENSKYY BLASTS GLOBAL INACTION ON IRAN, CLAIMS EUROPE STUCK IN ‘GREENLAND MODE’
Zelenskyy and Putin are under increasing pressure to reach a peace deal as the fourth anniversary of Moscow's invasion approaches and President Donald Trump pushes to end the war.
While Russia has demanded Ukraine cede the Donbas, Zelenskyy has stood firm in his opposition to making land concessions, though the discussions in Abu Dhabi suggest that he could be ready to negotiate. Putin is demanding Ukraine surrender the 20% it holds of the Donetsk region of the Donbas, according to Reuters.
"The question of Donbas is key. It will be discussed how the three sides... see this in Abu Dhabi today and tomorrow," Zelenskyy told reporters via WhatsApp, according to Reuters. The outlet added that an aide for Zelenskyy said the talks are expected to continue Saturday.
The envoys are meeting as Ukrainians face below-freezing temperatures after Russian strikes damaged the country's power supply.
Maxim Timchenko, the head of Ukraine's top private power producer, told Reuters that the situation was nearing a "humanitarian catastrophe."
While speaking with reporters on Air Force One, Trump was asked if the trilateral meeting could lead to one with himself, Putin and Zelenskyy. He would not commit but said that "any time we meet, it's good." He also expressed doubts about whether Putin wanted to take over all of Ukraine.
"What's happened here is there were times when Putin didn't want to make a deal, times when Zelenskyy didn't want to make a deal, and it was opposite times. Now, I think they both want to make a deal. We'll find out," Trump said.
The president also acknowledged that the topics of the discussions that were happening had been debated for months.
The French navy intercepted a Russian oil tanker in the Mediterranean suspected of operating as part of Moscow’s shadow fleet, a network of falsely-flagged vessels used to export oil and avoid Western sanctions, according to reports.
President Emmanuel Macron said Thursday that French forces had boarded and searched the tanker, which is subject to international sanctions.
The ship was reportedly sailing from Murmansk, in northern Russia, under the Comoros flag.
Writing on X, Macron said the operation took place on the high seas in the Mediterranean with the support of several allied countries.
‘GHOST SHIPS’ FERRYING ILLICIT OIL HAVE SAILED INTO TRUMP’S CROSSHAIRS
The French president added that the vessel had been diverted for further checks.
The tanker, identified as the Grinch, was intercepted between the southern coast of Spain and the northern coast of Morocco in the western Mediterranean, French maritime police said.
The Associated Press reported the interception.
France and the U.K. gathered and shared intelligence on the vessel, according to French military officials who spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity.
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION FILES SEIZURE WARRANTS TARGETING SHIPS TIED TO VENEZUELAN OIL TRADE: REPORT
The interception is the latest in a growing number of Russian-linked vessels stopped by U.S. and European authorities in recent months as Western powers intensify efforts to disrupt Russia’s oil exports.
As previously reported by Fox News Digital, in early January, U.S. forces seized another sanctioned tanker in the Atlantic Ocean.
U.S. European Command (EUCOM) announced the seizure of the Russian-flagged Marinera oil tanker in the North Atlantic Sea.
France’s Mediterranean Maritime Prefecture said the team that boarded the Grinch Thursday had inspected the vessel and decided documents raised doubts about the regularity of the vessel’s flag.
US MILITARY SEIZES ANOTHER FUGITIVE OIL TANKER LINKED TO VENEZUELA
The tanker is being escorted by the French navy to an anchorage for additional verification.
The European Union has imposed 19 rounds of sanctions on Russia since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
Despite those measures, Russia has continued to export millions of barrels of oil, mainly to China and India and often at discounted prices.
What has become known as a "shadow fleet" consists of hundreds of old and poorly regulated tankers that change names, ownership structures and flags to avoid detection and sanctions.
Maritime data firm Lloyd’s List Intelligence estimates the global shadow fleet at about 1,400 tankers, many of which are subject to U.S., British or European sanctions, Reuters reported.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy criticized European countries for not doing more to stop the transport of Russian oil using sanctioned vessels and which he says helps fund the war in Ukraine.
"Why can [U.S. President Donald Trump] stop tankers of the ‘shadow fleet’ and seize their oil, while Europe can’t?" Zelensky asked at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Thursday.
"Russian oil is transported right along the European coast. This oil funds the war against Ukraine. This oil helps destabilize Europe."
Greenland has barely registered in global politics for much of modern history. Until recent weeks, it was regarded as a far-away, ice-covered territory at the edge of world affairs, with very limited influence. The world’s largest island […]
The post Why Everyone Suddenly Cares About Greenland first appeared on The Expose.
U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday confirmed that Russian President Vladimir Putin received an invitation to join his new Board of Peace that will supervise the next phase of the Gaza peace plan.
Trump confirmed Putin's invitation while speaking to reporters at the College Football National Championship Game in Florida, where Indiana defeated Miami.
"Yeah, he’s been invited," Trump told reporters.
SIX COUNTRIES CONFIRM US INVITATIONS TO GAZA PEACE BOARD
The Kremlin said earlier on Monday that Putin had received the invitation, adding that it is now "studying the details" and will seek clarity of "all the nuances" in communications with the U.S. government.
France has also received an invitation but does not plan to join the Board of Peace "at this stage," a French official close to President Emmanuel Macron said on Monday.
The French official said the issue is raising questions, particularly with regard to respect for the principles and structure of the United Nations.
Asked at the championship game about Macron being unlikely to join, Trump took jabs at his French counterpart and threatened tariffs for refusing to accept the invitation.
"Well, nobody wants him because he's going to be out of office very soon," Trump said of Macron.
"I'll put a 200% tariff on his wines and champagnes, and he'll join," he added. "But he doesn't have to join."
LINDSEY GRAHAM MEETS WITH MOSSAD DIRECTOR DURING TRIP TO ISRAEL
Several other countries have also received invitations, including Israel, Canada, Belarus, Slovenia and Thailand.
Morocco, Vietnam, Kazakhstan, Hungary and Argentina have already accepted invitations.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Denmark on Monday ramped up its military presence in Greenland, deploying extra troops to the strategic Arctic territory amid escalating tensions with President Donald Trump.
Local Danish broadcaster TV 2 said the Danish Armed Forces confirmed a new contingent of troops, described as "a substantial contribution," were arriving at Greenland’s main international airport Monday night.
Maj. Gen. Søren Andersen, head of Denmark’s Arctic Command, said about 100 Danish soldiers have already arrived in Nuuk, Greenland’s capital, with others later deployed to Kangerlussuaq in western Greenland.
The new military move comes in the wake of comments made by Trump over the region's strategic and military importance.
WHITE HOUSE URGES 'COOLER HEADS TO PREVAIL' AS EU FIRES BACK ON TRUMP TARIFFS OVER GREENLAND
In a Truth Social post Jan. 18, Trump warned that Denmark had failed to secure Greenland against foreign threats.
"NATO has been telling Denmark, for 20 years, that ‘you have to get the Russian threat away from Greenland,’" Trump wrote.
"Unfortunately, Denmark has been unable to do anything about it. Now it is time, and it will be done!!!" he said.
US CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION VISITS DENMARK AMID BACKLASH OVER TRUMP'S PUSH TO ACQUIRE GREENLAND
On Monday, a text message exchange between Trump and Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre over Greenland and the Nobel Peace Prize was released in a statement.
"Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China, and why do they have a ‘right of ownership’ anyway?" Trump said before adding that there were "no written documents; it’s only that a boat landed there hundreds of years ago, but we had boats landing there, also," he said in part of the exchange.
"I have done more for NATO than any other person since its founding, and now, NATO should do something for the United States. The world is not secure unless we have complete and total control of Greenland. Thank you! President DJT," he added.
Before now, according to Reuters, Andersen had said that Danish troop deployment was driven by broader security concerns, not by Trump’s statements.
NATO AMBASSADOR SAYS EUROPE 'HAS A TENDENCY TO OVERREACT' OVER GREENLAND DISPUTE
Danish Defense Minister Troels Lund Poulsen also said that Denmark has begun increasing its military footprint in and around Greenland in cooperation with its NATO allies and as part of efforts to strengthen Arctic defense, Reuters reported.
Danish forces already stationed in Greenland could remain for a year or more, with additional rotations planned in the coming years.
Meanwhile, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Jan. 15 the presence of European troops would not affect Trump’s interest in acquiring Greenland.
"I don't think troops from Europe impact the president's decision-making process, nor does it impact his goal of the acquisition of Greenland at all," she told reporters.
The additional Danish troop deployment also came following Trump’s announcement that the U.S. would impose a 10% import tax starting in February on goods from countries that have supported Denmark and Greenland, including Norway.
Fox News Digital has reached out to the White House for comment.
Verwandte Tags
A U.S. Navy veteran, who was reportedly sailing in international waters until Russian authorities forced him to dock his yacht with a firearm onboard, has been sentenced to five years in prison for smuggling weapons, court officials announced Monday.
The court system of Krasnodar Krai identified the man as Charles Wayne Zimmerman, 58, whom U.S. officials had reported missing before Monday's announcement. A website set up in support of Zimmerman described him as a U.S. Navy veteran, a father of two and an electrician, The Associated Press (AP) reported.
According to local authorities, Zimmerman docked his yacht in the Russian port city of Sochi on June 19, 2025, after departing from North Carolina in July 2024 and sailing through several European countries. During border control in Sochi, Zimmerman allegedly failed to declare a firearm onboard. Authorities said an inspection later uncovered the weapons and ammunition, which they claimed had been purchased by Zimmerman prior to entering Russia.
At the subsequent court hearing, "the defendant pleaded guilty in full," the court system in Krasnodar Krai said. Records show Zimmerman was convicted in October and that the Sochi court’s verdict was upheld two months later by the Krasnodar Regional Court, the AP reported.
RUSSIA UPS JAIL SENTENCE OF U.S. CITIZEN TO 10 YEARS FOR BEATING PRISON STAFF
Zimmerman’s sister, Robin Stultz, claimed that her brother was wrongfully detained in Russia, saying that Russian authorities forced him to pilot his vessel to Sochi from international waters, according to the AP.
He was "sailing in international waters when he was intercepted by the Russian Navy and forced to motor 22 hours to Sochi," Stultz added in a statement to CBS News.
Zimmerman reportedly disclosed his weapons but was charged anyway, Stultz said, claiming that his arrest was a strategic move by Russia to use him as leverage in a potential U.S. exchange.
VENEZUELA ARRESTS MORE AMERICANS AS TRUMP RAMPS UP PRESSURE ON MADURO: REPORT
"He was sailing from the U.S. to New Zealand, so of course, he had a firearm on board," she told the AP in a statement. "You can’t just call 911 if something goes wrong out at sea. He voluntarily disclosed it to them and they charged him with arms smuggling. This is an obvious set-up to get another American they can trade. He needs to be declared wrongfully detained."
His sister added that she "wouldn't trust any 'confession' the Russians claim he's given," and alleged that Russian authorities had denied her brother access to U.S. diplomatic representatives since his arrest.
Washington has accused Moscow of imprisoning U.S. nationals to use them as bargaining chips for Russian spies held abroad. Since the start of the Ukraine war in 2022, dozens of Westerners, including Americans, have been detained in Russia, with many later released in prisoner exchanges.
Russian authorities reported that Zimmerman decided to sail to Sochi on his own after reportedly meeting a Russian woman online. While he reportedly did not know it was illegal to store weapons on his yacht when docking, authorities said that "ignorance of the law does not exempt from liability."
"He met a girl online who lives in Kazan and decided to join her in Russia on his yacht," the Krasnodar Krai court system said. "Before setting out, he didn't bother to research Russian laws and assumed that the weapons he kept on board for self-defense should simply remain on board at all times."
A video released by the regional court shows a docked yacht, a single black hunting rifle in a case and two boxes of Remington rifle-caliber cartridges.
On Sept. 6, 2024, the U.S. Coast Guard’s East region issued a missing person alert for then-57-year-old Charles Zimmerman, who had departed North Carolina aboard his 35-foot green-and-white-hulled vessel, named the Trude Zena. He was reportedly heading to New Zealand, with planned stops in the Mediterranean Sea.
Ukrainian drone strikes targeted energy infrastructure across Russian-controlled areas in southern Ukraine in an attack on Sunday, leaving hundreds of thousands of people without power.
Ukrainian officials say the attack is an effort to "weaponize winter," much as Russian forces targeted Ukraine's power grid. Russia's attacks continued in kind overnight, killing two people, Ukraine says.
More than 200,000 households in the Russia-held part of Ukraine’s southern Zaporizhzhia region had no electricity on Sunday, according to the Kremlin-installed local governor.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in a Telegram post that repairing the country’s energy system remains challenging, "but we are doing everything we can to restore everything as quickly as possible."
He said that two people were killed in overnight attacks across the country that struck Sumy, Kharkiv, Dnipro, Zaporizhzhia, Khmelnytskyi and Odesa.
In total, more than 1,300 attack drones, 1,050 guided aerial bombs and 29 missiles of various types were used by Russia to strike Ukraine this week, Ukraine says.
Meanwhile, discussions continue between the U.S., Ukraine and Russia in an effort to secure a peace deal. Zelenskyy has consistently argued Russia is not committed to the peace process.
RUSSIA FIRES NEW HYPERSONIC MISSILE IN MASSIVE UKRAINE ATTACK, KREMLIN SAYS
"If Russia deliberately delays the diplomatic process, the world’s response should be decisive: more help for Ukraine and more pressure on the aggressor," Zelenskyy said Sunday.
President Donald Trump argued last week, however, that it was Ukraine, not Russia, holding up a possible peace agreement.
"I think he's ready to make a deal," Trump told Reuters of Putin. "I think Ukraine is less ready to make a deal."
When he was asked why U.S. intervention had not brought about an end to the war, Trump responded: "Zelenskyy," Reuters reported.
Trump refused to go into detail on why he believed Zelenskyy was holding back, saying that he believes the Ukrainian president was "having a hard time getting there," referring to a peace agreement. However, later in the interview, Trump said he would be willing to meet with Zelenskyy at the upcoming World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
While thousands of Iranians take to the streets daily demanding the downfall of the Islamic Republic, people in the small European country of Georgia, along Russia’s southern border, have been protesting at various levels of intensity for over a year following disputed parliamentary elections in 2024.
Everyday Georgians who are still braving freezing temperatures and allegations of violence by the authorities are looking at their peers fighting for democracy in Iran and seeing their own struggle playing out against a corrupt and unpopular regime.
"When you walk through the demonstrations every day in Tbilisi, all people talk about is Iran. The heated debate over it shows how much it matters and how optimism is out on the streets due to developments despite controversies," Tinatin Khidasheli, former defense minister of Georgia, told Fox News Digital.
IRAN'S ETHNIC MINORITIES COULD HOLD KEY TO REGIME'S FATE AS PROTESTS CONTINUE
"Developments in Iran resonate in a very human way: if people can challenge a far more despotic and violent regime, it reinforces the belief that resistance in Georgia is not futile," Khidasheli added.
Mass protests began shortly after the pro-Russia Georgian Dream party claimed victory in elections in October 2024 and halted Georgia’s efforts to join the European Union.
Georgians have long desired to move closer to the West and join the European Union, with opinion polls showing overwhelming support for joining the bloc. Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze halted Tbilisi’s accession path to join the EU shortly after taking power, sparking anger from many.
Tbilisi's main Rustaveli Avenue has been crowded with protesters chanting and blocking traffic, outraged at the ruling party pulling Georgia away from Europe and closer to a Russian-oriented foreign policy.
FRANCE CONDEMNS IRAN PROTEST CRACKDOWN, WEIGHS SATELLITE INTERNET AID AMID BLACKOUT
Erekle Koplatadze, a 33-year-old from Tbilisi, has been participating in protests almost daily since November 2024. Koplatadze, who was detained for six days for allegedly blocking a road while protesting in November 2025, told Fox News Digital that there has been a feeling of solidarity with the protests in Iran since people rose up in December against economic mismanagement and regime corruption.
"You will see many Lion and Sun flags (Iran's national flag until the 1979 Islamic Revolution) in front of Georgia’s Parliament. And there have been protests in front of the Iranian Embassy in Tbilisi," Koplatadze said.
Koplatadze said the news coming out of Iran and the regime’s brutal violence employed against innocent people has shaken many Georgians in the crowd and a shared sense of empathy has emerged.
"I don’t remember such a big protest in Tbilisi in support of a foreign nation except for Ukraine," he said.
Ana Riaboshenko, co-founder of the "Initiative Culture For Democracy" who attends protests on a regular basis, told Fox News Digital that developments in Iran directly affect Georgia, as well as all the countries in the region.
"Its transformation from a terrorist state to a democratic government will significantly change the situation and indeed contribute substantially to the global power balance and economy. A particularly positive outcome is expected with the collapse of the Russian-Iranian partnership."
G7 THREATENS IRAN WITH NEW SANCTIONS OVER NATIONWIDE PROTEST CRACKDOWN KILLING THOUSANDS
Riaboshenko pointed out that Russian-backed Georgian Dream representatives positioned themselves as partners with Tehran and bilateral relations and cooperation have increased since the rigged elections of 2024.
Civic IDEA, a Georgian NGO, issued a report in July 2025 detailing how Iranian businessmen and companies use Georgia as a strategic transit point to evade international sanctions and channel funds back to Iran.
Nearly 13,000 Iranian companies are registered in Georgia, according to the Civic IDEA report.
Marika Mikiashvili, Foreign Secretary of party Droa, part of the largest democratic alliance in Georgia, spoke to Fox News Digital and said while Georgians are in awe and very inspired by the bravery of Iranians, their struggle is a warning sign as much as it is profoundly inspiring.
"Many protesters see Iran as a cautionary tale of what happens when a consolidating dictatorship isn’t defeated soon enough," Mikiashvili warned.
There have also been no statements of support for the pro-democracy protests from the Georgian Dream government or condemnation of security force human rights violations against innocent people.
As the Georgian Dream government entrenched itself in power, it implemented harsh anti-demonstration laws to crack down on dissent and used disproportionate force and other brutal tactics to squash the unrest.
Human Rights Watch documented numerous laws that interfered with Georgians' rights to peacefully assemble, including steep fines for protest-related violations and abusive police tactics as thousands of people have been arbitrarily detained.
Since Georgian Dream’s election, 600 people have been arbitrarily detained, 300 protesters were tortured or subjected to inhumane treatment, 1,000 citizens received fines for political opinions, and 400 journalists have been arrested, beaten, and harassed, according to Transparency International Georgia, a non-governmental organization with the goal of combating corruption in Georgia.
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said Tuesday that Russia is losing between 20,000 and 25,000 troops each month in its war against Ukraine as fighting drags on into a fourth year.
Rutte told the Renew Europe Global Europe Forum in Brussels that the staggering number of casualties reflect the intensity of Ukraine’s defense, but warned that Russia remains NATO’s most significant long-term threat.
He cited Moscow’s round-the-clock weapons production and a pattern of aggressive behavior that he said shows no sign of easing.
"Let's not forget that the Russians at the moment are losing massive amounts of their soldiers," the NATO chief said.
"In months, this is 20 to 25,000 Russians dead. I'm not talking seriously wounded, killed. Dead. Twenty to 25,000 a month," Rutte told attendees. "When you compare that to the Afghan war in the 1980s, they lost 20,000 in 10 years. Now, they lose these amounts, and more, in one month. So, that's also unsustainable on their side."
A June study from the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a Washington-based defense and national security think tank, found that Russia has suffered extraordinarily high casualties while making only marginal territorial gains in Ukraine.
Since January 2024, Russian forces have seized about 5,000 square kilometers, less than 1% of Ukraine’s territory, while total Russian casualties have climbed toward 1 million, including as many as 250,000 killed, according to the analysis.
Moscow has continued striking Kyiv with missiles and drones as Washington works to secure a potential peace agreement to end the conflict.
Repeated Russian strikes on Ukraine in recent weeks have left hundreds of thousands without electricity and heating as temperatures plunge below freezing.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Wednesday that Russia struck the Dnipro, Zhytomyr, Zaporizhzhia, Kharkiv, and Kherson regions, targeting its energy facilities and critical infrastructure.
U.S. deputy Ambassador to the United Nations Tammy Bruce condemned previous Russian strikes during an emergency Security Council meeting in New York on Monday as a "dangerous and inexplicable escalation."
As Iran faces escalating nationwide protests and rising verbal threats from the Trump administration, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei delivered a pointed warning to the United States this week from an unusual platform — his Russian-language account on X — a move analysts say underscores Tehran’s alignment with Moscow as pressure mounts on the regime.
In a post dated Jan. 11, Khamenei wrote in Russian, "The United States today is miscalculating in its approach toward Iran." Hours later, he followed with a second message, also in Russian, warning that Americans had suffered defeat before because of "miscalculations" and would do so again because of "erroneous planning."
Ksenia Svetlova, executive director of the Regional Organization for Peace, Economy and Security (ROPES) and an associate fellow at Chatham House, said the language choice was telling, even if the execution was clumsy.
"This is bad Russian," Svetlova told Fox News Digital. "It seems that it’s translated by Google Translate, not by a human being." Still, she said the use of Khamenei’s Russian-language account was no surprise given how closely Iran and Russia have aligned in recent years.
Khamenei’s warning came as Iran’s internal crisis continued to deepen. According to HRANA, a human rights organization tracking the unrest, at least 544 people have been killed in nationwide protests, with dozens of additional cases still under review. Opposition group NCRI has claimed the death toll is far higher — more than 3,000 — though exact figures remain difficult to verify amid widespread internet blackouts imposed by Iranian authorities.
President Donald Trump has led U.S. criticism in response to the rising death toll. In response to a question about whether Iran had crossed a red line, Trump responded by saying, "They're starting to, it looks like. And they seem to be some people killed that aren't supposed to be killed. These are violent. If you call them leaders, I don't know if they're leaders, or just they rule through violence. But we're looking at it very seriously," he said on Sunday aboard Air Force One.
IRANIAN PRESIDENT SAYS HIS COUNTRY IS AT 'TOTAL WAR' WITH THE US, ISRAEL AND EUROPE: REPORTS
"We’re looking at some very strong options," he added.
Iranian leaders have pushed back, accusing Washington of interference and warning that any U.S. military action would trigger retaliation against American forces and allies in the region.
At the same time, Tehran has signaled it wants to keep diplomatic back channels open. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said Monday that communication between Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff remains active. Axios separately reported that Araghchi reached out to Witkoff over the weekend amid Trump’s warnings of possible military action.
IRANIAN MILITARY LEADER THREATENS PREEMPTIVE ATTACK AFTER TRUMP COMMENTS
Despite those overtures, analysts say Khamenei’s Russian-language message reflects where Iran sees its most reliable strategic partner.
Russia has become a critical lifeline for Tehran, particularly as Moscow relies on Iranian-supplied drones and other military equipment for its war in Ukraine. That dependence, Svetlova said, means Iran’s internal instability could carry serious consequences for the Kremlin.
"I think that could be a dramatic effect, because they do depend on Iran — specifically military production, the drones and ballistic missiles," she said. "They need them to continue their war against Ukraine."
Yet the partnership has also fueled resentment inside Iran. Svetlova pointed to criticism following the 12-day war with Israel, when many Iranians accused Moscow of failing to come to Tehran’s aid.
"There was a lot of criticism in Iran against Russia that it did not come to help," she said. "It didn’t reach out. It didn’t do anything, basically."
Still, she said Russia has few alternatives as its global position narrows. With longtime allies weakened or toppled, such as Bashar al-Assad in Syria and Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela, Moscow is increasingly reliant on Tehran — even as it remains largely silent about the protests rocking Iran.
Against that backdrop, Svetlova explained, Khamenei’s warning in Russian appears like a signal — to Washington and to Moscow — that Iran sees its confrontation with the United States as part of a shared front with President Vladimir Putin.
Verwandte Tags
Die außen- und innenpolitischen Entscheidungen der Bundesregierung und der EU hinsichtlich Russlands werden fast ausschließlich mit Behauptungen begründet, die sich reihenweise als falsch oder nicht belegt herausgestellt haben. So existiert kein einziger handfester Beleg dafür, dass Russland nach einem Sieg in der Ukraine NATO-Staaten angreifen will oder bereits jetzt schon einen „hybriden Krieg“ gegen die EU führt. Auf Nachfragen bei entsprechenden Regierungsstellen geben diese Geheimdienstinformationen an, die nicht öffentlich bereitstehen. Auch die derzeit ausgesetzte Einschätzung des Verfassungsschutzes, die AfD sei „gesichert rechtsextremistisch“, basiert ausschließlich auf einem nicht öffentlichen Gutachten. Von Karsten Montag.
Es deutet alles darauf hin, dass die vielen Behauptungen, die derzeit den maßgeblichen Kurs der EU und vieler europäischer Regierungen – darunter insbesondere auch der deutschen – bestimmen, frei erfunden sind. Ob Aufrüstung, Wehrpflicht, Wahlannullierungen oder das angestrebte Verbotsverfahren gegen die AfD – alles wird letztendlich mit Geheimdienstinformationen begründet, die der Öffentlichkeit nicht zur Verfügung stehen. Die wenigen öffentlichen Informationen haben sich hingegen ausschließlich als nicht bestätigt oder sogar als falsch herausgestellt. Statt dies einzugestehen, zensiert der Rat der EU nun mit rechtlich äußerst fragwürdigen Mitteln und fadenscheinigen Begründungen Stimmen, die auf diesen Missstand hinweisen.
Nachfolgend werden die drei herausstechenden Behauptungen – Russland will weitere EU-Staaten angreifen und befindet sich bereits jetzt schon in einem hybriden Krieg mit der EU sowie die „gesicherte“ Rechtsextremität der AfD – genauer analysiert. Die Umgehung national verankerter Grundrechte mithilfe des Sanktionsregimes des EU-Rates stellt dabei derzeit die bei Weitem am meisten angsteinflößende Entwicklung dar.
Behauptung Nr. 1: Russland will nach der Ukraine weitere europäische Staaten angreifen
Auf dem CSU-Parteitag Mitte Dezember verglich Bundeskanzler Friedrich Merz (CDU) den russischen Präsidenten Wladimir Putin mit dem ehemaligen deutschen Diktator Adolf Hitler. Merz behauptete, dass – ähnlich, wie dem Deutschen Reich 1938 das Sudetenland nicht gereicht habe – auch Putin nicht aufhören würde, wenn die Ukraine fällt. Es ginge ihm um die „grundlegende Veränderung der Grenzen in Europa“ und die „Wiederherstellung der alten Sowjetunion“ in deren Grenzen, so Merz.
Im Juni behauptete Verteidigungsminister Boris Pistorius (SPD) im Bundestag, man dürfe nicht glauben, dass Putin an den Grenzen der Ukraine haltmachen werde. Russland sei auch für Georgien, Moldawien und letztlich für die NATO eine Bedrohung. Da Putins Kriegswirtschaft auf einen weiteren Konflikt zuarbeiten würde, müsse Deutschland bis 2029 „kriegstüchtig“ sein, erklärte der Minister.
Dies sind nur zwei Stimmen in einem breiten Kanon ähnlich lautender Aussagen deutscher und europäischer Politiker, Militärs und Geheimdienste. Doch gibt es irgendwelche Belege, die diese Behauptungen bestätigen könnten?
Die Sichtweise des Kremls auf den Konflikt in der Ukraine
Bereits auf dem NATO-Gipfel 2008 in Bukarest hatte Russlands Präsident Putin die Mitgliedsstaaten des Bündnisses gewarnt, dass Moskau eine weitere Ausweitung des Bündnisses Richtung Osten als „direkte Bedrohung“ ansehen werde. Auf dem Treffen wurde die zukünftige Aufnahme der Ukraine und Georgiens in das Verteidigungsbündnis diskutiert und eine zukünftige Mitgliedschaft in Aussicht gestellt.
Am 24. Februar 2022 nannte Putin laut der Nachrichtenagentur Reuters folgende Gründe für den Einmarsch in die Ukraine:
„Ich habe beschlossen, eine spezielle Militäroperation durchzuführen. Ihr Ziel ist es, Menschen zu schützen, die in den letzten acht Jahren Opfer von Mobbing und Völkermord geworden sind. Und dafür werden wir uns für die Entmilitarisierung und Entnazifizierung der Ukraine einsetzen. Und um diejenigen vor Gericht zu bringen, die zahlreiche blutige Verbrechen gegen Zivilisten begangen haben, darunter auch gegen Bürger der Russischen Föderation.“
Nach Angaben der Vereinten Nationen sind in der Zeit des Bürgerkriegs im ukrainischen Donbass-Becken in der Zeit von 2014 bis Ende 2021 zwischen 14.200 und 14.400 Menschen ums Leben gekommen – davon circa 3.400 Zivilisten, 4.400 Angehörige der ukrainischen Armee sowie 6.500 Angehörige der bewaffneten Truppen der Separatisten. Ausgelöst wurde der Konflikt durch den gewaltsamen Umsturz des demokratisch gewählten und in der Region Donezk geborenen Präsidenten Viktor Janukowitsch im Jahr 2014 – dem sogenannten „Euromaidan“.
Es gibt eindeutige Hinweise darauf, dass der Umsturz vom Westen – insbesondere von den USA – unterstützt worden ist. Das Magazin Der Spiegel berichtete 2015, dass der ukrainische „Rechte Sektor“ eine der „treibenden Kräfte der Maidan-Revolution“ gewesen ist. An der nachfolgenden Übergangsregierung war unter anderem auch die ukrainische rechtsextreme Partei „Swoboda“ beteiligt. Das „Regiment Asow“, von der Frankfurter Rundschau als ukrainische „Eliteeinheit“ bezeichnet, verwendet nachweislich rechtsextreme Symbole. Dies wird unter anderem von den Wissenschaftlichen Diensten des Bundestags bestätigt.
Die Ergebnisse einer Volkszählung aus dem Jahr 2001 zeigen, dass ethnische Russen 17 Prozent der ukrainischen Bevölkerung ausmachen. Aus derselben Erhebung geht hervor, dass für 30 Prozent der Bevölkerung Russisch die Muttersprache darstellt. Insbesondere in den südlichen und östlichen Regionen der Ukraine ist der Anteil ethnischer Russen und russischer Muttersprachler besonders hoch. Dieser bewegt sich zwischen einem Anteil von 14 Prozent ethnischer Russen (25 Prozent russische Muttersprachler) in der Region Cherson und 58 Prozent ethnische Russen (77 Prozent russische Muttersprachler) auf der Halbinsel Krim.
In diesen Regionen hatte in der Präsidentschaftswahl 2010 – der letzten Wahl unter Beteiligung aller ukrainischen Wahlkreise – der aus dem Donbas stammende Viktor Janukowitsch, Sohn eines polnischstämmigen weißrussischen Vaters und einer russischen Mutter, teilweise weit mehr als 50 Prozent der Stimmen erlangt.
Abbildung 1: Ergebnisse der ukrainischen Präsidentschaftswahlen 2010, Quelle: Vasyl Babych – Eigenes Werk, CC BY 3.0
In westlichen Medien finden sich fast ausschließlich nur Hinweise darauf, dass die Separatisten von Russland unterstützt worden sind. Aus einem aufwendig recherchierten Bericht der New York Times vom März 2025 geht jedoch hervor, dass die ukrainische Armee bereits unter US-Präsident Barack Obama ab 2014 mit militärischer Aufklärung von den USA unterstützt wurde. In der ersten Amtszeit von US-Präsident Donald Trump ab 2017 erhielt die Ukraine demnach auch Waffenlieferungen aus den Vereinigten Staaten. Ein ähnlich umfangreicher weiterer Beitrag der britischen Tageszeitung The Times vom April 2025 enthüllt, dass britische Ausbildungstruppen bereits seit 2015 in der Ukraine stationiert waren. Damit erfüllt der Bürgerkrieg im Donbass zwischen 2014 und 2022 die Kriterien eines Stellvertreterkriegs zwischen den USA sowie Großbritannien auf der einen und Russland auf der anderen Seite.
Am 14. Juni 2024 nannte Putin laut Reuters als Bedingungen für einen Waffenstillstand und die Aufnahme von Friedensverhandlungen den vollständigen Abzug der ukrainischen Truppen aus dem gesamten Gebiet der Regionen Donezk, Luhansk, Cherson und Saporischschja sowie das Zugeständnis der ukrainischen Regierung, ihre Pläne für einen NATO-Beitritt aufzugeben. Diese Bedingungen haben sich bis heute nicht geändert.
In einer Rede am 17. Dezember 2025 kündigte der russische Präsident jedoch an, Russland werde weitere Gebiete in der Ukraine mit Gewalt einnehmen, wenn Kiew und die europäischen Politiker sich nicht auf die Vorschläge der USA für eine Friedenslösung einlassen würden. Dabei ging er auch auf die westlichen Warnungen ein, Russland könne eines Tages ein Land des NATO-Militärbündnisses angreifen:
„Ich habe wiederholt gesagt: Das ist eine Lüge, Unsinn, reiner Unsinn über eine imaginäre russische Bedrohung für europäische Länder. Aber das geschieht ganz bewusst.“
Der US-amerikanische Politikwissenschaftler John Mearsheimer geht davon aus, dass Russland bis zu 40 Prozent des Territoriums der Ukraine erobern wird, darunter auch die beiden Großstädte Odessa und Charkiw, wenn die ukrainische Armee „kollabieren“ sollte. Hintergrund sei die Annahme Putins, dass es nicht zu einem dauerhaften Frieden in der Ukraine kommen wird und Russland das Land so weit schwächen müsse, dass nur noch ein dysfunktionaler Reststaat übrigbleibt. Mearsheimer geht jedoch nicht davon aus, dass Russland die ganze Ukraine einnehmen wird.
Fazit: keine handfesten Belege, sondern nur Behauptungen und angebliche Geheimdienstinformationen
Die hier erfolgte Darstellung dient nicht dazu, das direkte Eingreifen der russischen Armee in den Bürgerkrieg in der Ukraine zu rechtfertigen, sondern um Belege für die Behauptung vieler europäischer Führungspolitiker zu finden, dass Russland nicht nur die ganze Ukraine einnehmen, sondern auch weitere europäische Länder angreifen wird. Weder aus den Aussagen des russischen Präsidenten noch aus der Historie des Konfliktes in der Ukraine lassen sich diese Behauptungen ableiten.
Neben John Mearsheimer halten eine ganze Reihe internationaler geopolitischer Analysten und Beobachter die NATO-Ostererweiterung für den ursächlichen Grund des Konfliktes in der Ukraine – darunter die US-Amerikaner Jeffrey Sachs und Daniel L. Davis, der Norweger Glenn Diesen und der Brite Alexander Mercouris. Mearsheimer nennt explizit die Entscheidung auf dem NATO-Gipfel 2008, die Ukraine und Georgien in das Verteidigungsbündnis aufzunehmen, als Ursache für das „Desaster“ in der Ukraine. Er geht davon aus, dass Historiker eines Tages diese Entscheidung als eine der „schicksalhaftesten“ der Weltgeschichte bezeichnen werden.
Was in die vorliegende Betrachtung nicht einfließen kann, sind etwaige Geheimdienstinformationen, die nicht öffentlich zugänglich sind. Erst kürzlich hat der Präsident des Bundesnachrichtendienstes, Martin Jäger, laut Tagesschau geäußert, Deutschland dürfe sich nicht „zurücklehnen“ und denken, ein russischer Angriff käme frühestens 2029. Deutschland stände „schon jetzt im Feuer“. Allerdings nennen weder Jäger noch das Nachrichtenformat einen einzigen Beleg für diese Behauptung. Zudem ließe sich nicht ausschließen, dass Russland irgendwann in der Zukunft doch noch weitere europäische Länder angreift – beispielsweise unter einer neuen Regierung im Kreml, die dem westlichen Ausland weniger wohlgesonnen ist als der langjährige russische Präsident Wladimir Putin.
Behauptung Nr. 2: Russland führt bereits jetzt schon einen „hybriden Krieg“ gegen Europa
Auch die Einschätzung, Russland führe einen „hybriden Krieg“ gegen die EU, lässt sich mit öffentlich verfügbaren Informationen so gut wie nicht bestätigen. Das hindert jedoch beispielsweise Bundesinnenminister Alexander Dobrindt nicht daran, wiederholt von „hybriden Angriffen“ Russlands zu sprechen. Konkrete Belege dazu fehlen – im Gegenteil. Die Behauptungen einer „hybriden Bedrohung“ Russlands, beispielsweise aufgrund von Drohnensichtungen, GPS-Störung und Wahlbeeinflussungen, können häufig widerlegt werden oder stellen sich als nicht nachweisbar heraus. Das hält diejenigen, die mit derartigen Aussagen eine angebliche Bedrohungslage dramatisieren, nicht davon ab, weiterzumachen und nicht öffentliche Geheimdienstinformationen als vermeintliche Belege anzuführen.
So behauptete Dobrindt erst kürzlich in einem Interview mit der Tageszeitung Die Welt, das Innenministerium mitsamt seinen unterstellten Behörden würde beobachten, dass Linksextremisten versuchen, „Staat und Institutionen zu delegitimieren“. Themen wie Wehrpflicht und NATO-Aufrüstung spielten dabei eine Rolle. Es sei nicht auszuschließen, dass „ausländische Mächte“ solche Aktivitäten unterstützen. Auffällig sei, so Dobrindt weiter, wie häufig linksextreme Gruppen „russische Narrative“ im Kontext des Ukraine-Kriegs übernehmen. Konkrete Belege dafür nannte er nicht.
Weitgefasste und schwammige Definition von „hybriden Bedrohungen“ öffnen die Büchse der Pandora
Auffällig ist jedoch, wie die Definition von „hybrid“ so weit gefasst wird, dass selbst die Sichtweise der russischen Regierung auf den Konflikt in der Ukraine als „hybride Bedrohung“ dargestellt wird. Mit den rechtlich äußerst schwammigen Begriffen „Desinformation“ und „Propaganda“ hat der EU-Rat bereits im März 2022 die russischen, vom Kreml finanzierten Auslandssender Russia Today und Sputnik sanktioniert. So heißt es in der zugehörigen Verordnung:
„Um ihre Aggressionen gegen die Ukraine zu rechtfertigen und zu unterstützen, betreibt die Russische Föderation kontinuierliche und konzertierte Propagandaaktionen, die sich gegen die Zivilgesellschaft der Union und ihrer Nachbarländer richten und die Fakten drastisch verzerren und manipulieren. Diese Propagandaaktionen wurden über eine Reihe von Medien unter ständiger direkter oder indirekter Kontrolle der Führung der Russischen Föderation verbreitet. Solche Maßnahmen stellen eine erhebliche und unmittelbare Bedrohung für die öffentliche Ordnung und Sicherheit der Union dar.“
Dass in den westlichen Medien diesbezüglich offensichtlich ein Doppelstandard angewandt wird, kann man an der Reaktion der Intendantin der Deutschen Welle (DW), ein von der Bundesregierung aus Steuergeldern finanzierter Auslandssender, auf dessen Einschränkungen in Russland erkennen. So heißt es in einem Mitte Dezember veröffentlichten Bericht der Tagesschau mit dem Titel „Deutsche Welle in Russland ‚unerwünschte Organisation‘:
„DW-Intendantin Barbara Massing kritisierte die Verschärfung des Vorgehens gegen freie Medien durch die russische Justiz. Der Schritt zeige, ‚wie wenig das Regime von Pressefreiheit hält und wie sehr es unabhängige Informationen fürchtet‘, erklärte DW-Intendantin Barbara Massing. Die Deutsche Welle werde sich nicht abschrecken lassen durch den ‚Versuch, freie Medien zum Schweigen zu bringen‘, so Massing in einer Mitteilung des Senders. ‚Trotz Zensur und Blockade unserer Angebote durch die russische Regierung erreicht die DW mit ihrem Russisch-Angebot heute mehr Menschen als zuvor‘, erklärte sie. ‚Wir werden weiterhin unabhängig berichten – über den Angriffskrieg gegen die Ukraine und andere Themen, über die in Russland kaum Informationen verfügbar sind. Damit sich die Menschen ihre eigene Meinung bilden können.‘“
In der Meldung der „Tagesschau“ findet sich kein Wort darüber, dass bereits seit März 2022 ein Sendeverbot der Deutschen Welle in Russland herrscht – und dass dieses als Reaktion auf das Sendeverbot von RT Deutsch erfolgte. Zudem fehlt jegliche Reflexion darüber, dass jedes Medium – insbesondere staatlich finanzierte – seinen Mitarbeitern inhaltliche Vorgaben macht. Beiträge, wie sie von den NachDenkSeiten veröffentlicht werden und welche die russische Sichtweise auf den Konflikt in der Ukraine ohne Voreingenommenheit analysieren, sucht man bei der Deutschen Welle vergeblich.
An den beiden Textauszügen ist zu erkennen, dass bei der Sanktionierung russischer Medien in der EU alles davon abhängt, was Verdrehungen und Verzerrungen von Fakten und was unabhängige Berichterstattungen von freien Medien sind. An dieser Stelle wird es rechtlich heikel, denn bei den Maßnahmen ist die EU laut dem Online-Magazin Legal Tribune Online an die Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union gebunden – insbesondere an Artikel 11, der die Freiheit der Meinungsäußerung und die Informationsfreiheit garantiert.
RT France hatte stellvertretend für die anderen europäischen Ableger des Senders gegen die EU-Sanktion geklagt. Das zuständige Gericht der Europäischen Union wies die Klage jedoch im Juli 2022 ab. In ihrer Urteilsbegründung argumentierten die Richter, dass mit der Ausübung der Freiheit der Meinungsäußerung Pflichten und Verantwortlichkeiten verbunden sind, die bei „audiovisuellen Medien“ wie RT France besondere Bedeutung hätten. Für „Propagandatätigkeiten zur Rechtfertigung und Unterstützung des illegalen, unprovozierten und ungerechtfertigten militärischen Angriffs der Russischen Föderation auf die Ukraine“ könne der verstärkte Schutz, den die Pressefreiheit nach Artikel 11 der Grundrechtscharta genießt, nicht in Anspruch genommen werden. Dies gelte insbesondere deshalb, da RT France unter der „direkten oder indirekten Kontrolle des Aggressorstaats“ steht.
In der Urteilsbegründung pflichtet das Gericht dem EU-Rat bei, dass er RT France zu Recht aufgrund der Propagandaaktionen zugunsten des militärischen Angriffs der Russischen Föderation „restriktiven Maßnahmen“ unterworfen hat, definiert jedoch an keiner Stelle, was Propaganda überhaupt ist oder wer dafür zuständig ist, zu definieren, was Propaganda sein soll. Auch sucht man vergeblich nach konkreten Belegen für die „Propagandaaktionen“ von Russia Today – sowohl im Sanktionstext des EU-Rats als auch in der Urteilsbegründung des Gerichts der Europäischen Union.
Damit hat der Rat der EU mit Unterstützung des Gerichts der Europäischen Union die Büchse der Pandora geöffnet, was weitreichende Konsequenzen nach sich zieht. Denn mit dem Vorwurf, russische Propaganda zu betreiben oder die öffentliche Ordnung und Sicherheit der Union zu bedrohen, kann der EU-Rat nun beliebige Unternehmen und Einzelpersonen sanktionieren, ohne rechtlichen Widerspruch fürchten zu müssen.
Trotz dünner Beweislage geht der EU-Rat mit rechtlich äußerst fragwürdigen und drastischen Mittel gegen kritische Stimmen vor
Dass der Rat, bestehend aus den Außenministern der EU-Mitgliedsstaaten, von diesem Instrument reichlich Gebrauch macht, ist an den Sanktionen selbst gegen Journalisten und Publizisten aus der EU und den Mitgliedsländern der Europäischen Freihandelsassoziation zu erkennen. Da die Sanktionen einstimmig beschlossen werden, ist jede einzelne Regierung der EU-Mitgliedsstaaten letztendlich dafür verantwortlich.
Besonders hervorzuheben sind die bereits im Mai verhängten Sanktionen gegen die deutschen Journalisten Thomas Röper, Alina Lipp und Hüseyin Doğru. Die Entscheidung, Jacques Baud, Oberst der Schweizer Armee a. D. und strategischer Analyst, auf die Sanktionsliste zu setzen, zeigt nicht nur, dass der EU-Rat gewillt ist, dieses Instrument weiter zu nutzen. Auch die Rechtfertigungen für die Zensurmaßnahmen werden immer fadenscheiniger. So heißt es in der offiziellen Begründung der EU, Baud sei regelmäßig zu Gast in „prorussischen Fernseh- und Radiosendungen“ und fungiere als „Sprachrohr für prorussische Propaganda“.
Wenn man weiß, in welchen angeblichen „prorussischen“ YouTube-Kanälen der ehemalige Schweizer Geheimdienstoffizier seine ausschließlich auf westlichen Quellen beruhenden geopolitischen Analysen darlegt, wird deutlich, welche Personen zukünftig mit weiteren Sanktionsmaßnahmen der EU zu rechnen haben. Es handelt sich dabei um genau diejenigen, die das Narrativ der EU und vieler ihrer Mitgliedsstaaten eines unprovozierten, brutalen russischen Angriffskriegs in der Ukraine in Frage stellen.
Dazu gehören unter anderem der norwegische Politologe und Professor an der Universität von Südost-Norwegen Glenn Diesen, der pensionierte und mehrfach ausgezeichnete Oberst der US-Armee Daniel L. Davis, die beiden geopolitischen Analysten Alexander Mercouris und Alex Christoforou vom YouTube-Kanal The Duran, der aus dem Iran stammende Professor für Geotechnik an der Universität von Brasília, Nima R. Alkhorshid, sowie der in Japan lehrende Schweizer Historiker Patrick Lottaz. In einer eigenen Sendung behandeln Lottaz und Diesen die Konsequenzen, die sich aus der Sanktionierung von Jacques Baud ergeben. Auch die eher die EU-Narrative unterstützende Neue Zürcher Zeitung kommentiert die Maßnahmen gegen den Schweizer Analysten vornehmlich kritisch.
Was machen diese Sanktionen mit einem regierungskritischen Journalisten in Deutschland?
Ich möchte für die folgende Passage meinen sachlichen Stil beim Schreiben zurückstellen und darüber berichten, wie sich jemand fühlt, der vielleicht nicht im nächsten Sanktionspaket der EU, jedoch mit großer Wahrscheinlichkeit in einem der darauffolgenden mit ähnlichen Einschränkungen konfrontiert sein könnte. Mir gefriert das Blut in den Adern, wenn ich sehe, mit welcher Willkür und Hemmungslosigkeit die EU-Außenminister die Meinungs- und Pressefreiheit unter Umgehung der jeweils nationalen Verfassungen der EU-Mitgliedsstaaten, die über Jahrzehnte elementare Grundrechte garantiert haben, kurzerhand zu Grabe tragen.
Hier findet eine Kommunikation mit einer eindeutigen Nachricht statt: „Wer mit seiner Meinung nicht auf unserer Seite steht, ist gegen uns und wird mit aller Härte der außerordentlichen Macht bestraft, die das Instrument der Sanktionen den Regierungen der EU-Staaten verleiht.“ Auf ein funktionierendes Rechtssystem, das die Betroffenen zeitnah vor dieser Willkür schützt, ist kein Verlass mehr. Dahinter steckt ein Schwarz-Weiß-Denken, das keine Zwischentöne mehr zulässt.
Diese Zwischentöne sind jedoch keine russische Propaganda – was immer das auch sein soll –, sondern bilden eine fundamentale Kritik an der Politik der EU-Kommission, dem Rat der EU sowie an den jeweiligen Regierungen der EU-Mitgliedsstaaten ab. Es handelt sich um eine Sichtweise von innen, die weder von der russischen Regierung finanziert noch von ihr beeinflusst wird. Sie zielt auch nicht darauf ab, die öffentliche Ordnung und Sicherheit der Union zu bedrohen, sondern sie vor einer übergriffigen EU-Kommission samt ihrer nationalen Unterstützer zu bewahren. Jedenfalls spiegelt dies meine persönliche Motivation wider, weiterhin Kritik auf Basis sachlicher Informationen und meines logischen Denkvermögens zu üben. Das halte ich auch für die wichtigste Funktion des Journalismus.
Mit Hüseyin Doğru und Jacques Baud versucht der EU-Rat, Stimmen dieser Zwischentöne von innen mundtot zu machen. Es ist kaum zu glauben, dass die EU-Außenminister zukünftig an dieser Stelle einfach aufhören und im Auftrag ihrer Regierungschefs nicht weitere unliebsame Kritik unterbinden – zumal sie bisher vom Gericht der EU Rückendeckung erhalten haben. Es handelt sich auch bei Weitem nicht um die erste Maßnahme, die in diese Richtung abzielt. Man denke nur an die Kontokündigungen von kritischen Journalisten sowie die Drohschreiben der Landesmedienanstalten an unabhängige Nachrichtenplattformen. Damit müssen Herausgeber, Redaktionen und Journalisten umgehen.
Bei mir erzeugt der Gedanke einer offensichtlichen staatlichen Zensur ein ganzes Spektrum an Gefühlen – von Ohnmacht und Wut über Angst und Trauer bis hin zu Trotz. Wenn ich höre, wie Hüseyin Doğru im Interview mit den NachDenkSeiten darüber berichtet, wie wenig er von Gewerkschaften und Journalistenverbänden unterstützt wird, verlässt mich sogar der Glaube an die Menschheit. Ich frage mich, ob die Politiker, Richter, Journalisten und Funktionäre, die diese, die Grundrechte verachtenden, Maßnahmen vorantreiben – beziehungsweise aus Angst vor persönlichen Konsequenzen keinen Widerstand dagegen leisten –, sich den Folgen ihres Handelns bewusst sind.
Das einzig Positive, das ich an dieser Entwicklung erkennen kann, ist die Tatsache, dass sich die derzeit verantwortlichen Politiker auf Bundes- und EU-Ebene offensichtlich von der Kritik der bisher eher unbedeutenden „alternativen“ Nachrichtenszene bedroht fühlen. Augenscheinlich führen sie ihre schlechten Umfragewerte darauf zurück. Dass sie darauf mit Methoden reagieren, die sie ihren politischen Gegnern vorwerfen und die an das Vorgehen von Autokraten in Unrechtsregimen erinnern, ist ein deutliches Zeichen von Schwäche.
Doch das mindert die Hoffnungslosigkeit und den Weltschmerz, die mich an manchen Tagen heimsuchen, nur kaum. Denn Alphatiere – und dazu gehören nun einmal Menschen, die sich dazu berufen fühlen, Macht auszuüben – haben die Tendenz, ihre Position mit allen ihnen verfügbaren Mitteln zu verteidigen, wenn sie sich angegriffen fühlen. Insbesondere die deutsche Geschichte zeigt, dass sie sich mit „nationalen Bedrohungslagen“ – mögen sie noch so konstruiert sein – schon mehrfach die Rückendeckung in der Bevölkerung absichern konnten.
Was mich als Silberstreif am Horizont vor dem Versinken in Fatalismus bewahrt, ist ein offensichtlich wachsendes qualifiziertes Medienpublikum, das sich von den autokratischen Bestrebungen nicht einschüchtern lässt. Wenn ich nur einen einzigen weiteren Menschen davon überzeugen kann, aktiv in der größten Wissensdatenbank, die der Welt bisher zur Verfügung stand, nach sachlichen, vertrauenswürdigen und konsistenten Informationen zu suchen, um daraus mit dem gesunden Menschenverstand eigene Schlüsse zu ziehen, anstatt sich das selbstständige Denken von Meinungsjournalisten abnehmen zu lassen, hat meine Arbeit für mich einen Erfolg gehabt.
Keine öffentlich zugänglichen Belege für Wahleinmischungen Russlands in Europa
Die bisherige Aufdeckung von falschen oder mangelnden Belegen, die eine angebliche „hybride Bedrohung“ Russlands dokumentieren sollen, ist beeindruckend und zeigt, dass eine kritische Haltung gegenüber den „offiziellen“ Narrativen begründet ist.
So hat sich herausgestellt, dass die angeblich von russischen Geheimdiensten gesteuerte TikTok-Kampagne, die zur Annullierung der ersten Wahlrunde der Präsidentschaftswahlen in Rumänien Ende 2024 geführt hat, nach Recherchen des rumänischen Investigativportals Snoop in Wirklichkeit von der damals amtierenden liberalkonservativen Präsidenten- und Regierungspartei Partidul Național Liberal (PNL) initiiert und bezahlt worden ist. Das hat die rumänische Wahlkommission nicht davon abgehalten, den Gewinner der annullierten Wahlrunde, einen Kritiker der westlichen Unterstützung der Ukraine, von der Wiederholung der Wahl auszuschließen.
Auch die wenigen öffentlich einsehbaren Belege, die deutsche Politiker und Geheimdienste dazu verleitet haben, von einer Beeinflussung der Bundestagswahl 2025 zu sprechen, basieren ausschließlich nur auf Vermutungen. Fragt man beispielsweise beim deutschen Auslandsgeheimdienst nach, woran die Behauptungen festgemacht werden, lautet die Antwort lapidar:
„Der Bundesnachrichtendienst nimmt zu Angelegenheiten, die etwaige nachrichtendienstliche Erkenntnisse oder Tätigkeiten betreffen, grundsätzlich nicht öffentlich Stellung. Damit ist keine Aussage getroffen, ob der Sachverhalt zutreffend ist oder nicht.“
Aus einem Interview mit einer Wahlbeobachterin der Parlamentswahlen in Moldawien geht sogar hervor, dass diese nicht etwa hauptsächlich von Russland manipuliert worden seien, sondern von der EU und der amtierenden prowestlichen moldawischen Regierung. Im Gegensatz zu diesem Zeugenbericht, der in der deutschen Presselandschaft schlichtweg ignoriert wird, hat der Auslandssender Deutsche Welle im Vorfeld der Wahlen einseitig von „massiven Sabotageaktionen“ Russlands berichtet.
Drohnensichtungen in Europa stehen fast ausnahmslos nicht mit Russland in Verbindung
Noch dünner und widersprüchlicher stellt sich die Beweislage für angeblich von Russland gesteuerte Drohnen dar, die an europäischen Flughäfen und Militäreinrichtungen gesichtet worden sein sollen. So äußerte Bundeskanzler Friedrich Merz Anfang Oktober in einem ARD-Interview, dass „wahrscheinlich“ ein „wesentlicher Teil“ der vermeintlichen Drohnen, die unter anderem zur Sperrung des Flughafen Münchens geführt haben, „aus Russland gesteuert“ würden.
Bundesverteidigungsminister Boris Pistorius brachte auf einer Bundeswehrtagung Anfang November Drohnensichtungen in Belgien unmissverständlich mit Russland in Verbindung. Es handele sich dabei um eine „Maßnahme“, die der „Verunsicherung“ und der „Angstmache“ in Belgien diene, um die Nutzung eingefrorener russischer Staatsvermögen für die Finanzierung der Ukraine zu verhindern, sagte der Minister.
EU-Kommissionspräsidentin Ursula von der Leyen bezeichnete die Sichtung von Drohnen am Flughafen in Kopenhagen im Rahmen einer Videobotschaft Ende November als „vorsätzliche Versuche, die europäischen Bürger einzuschüchtern“ und die „Entschlossenheit“ der EU zu untergraben, „der Ukraine beizustehen“. Auch hierbei handelt es sich nur um drei prominente Stimmen aus einer ganzen Flut von Behauptungen, die russischen Drohnen in Europa seien Teil der „hybriden Kriegsführung“ Russlands.
Aus einer Untersuchung zweier niederländischer Nachrichtenplattformen geht jedoch hervor, dass bis auf drei Vorfälle an den Ostgrenzen Polens, Rumäniens und Moldawiens alle diese Drohnensichtungen nicht mit Russland in Verbindung standen. Entweder hat sich der Verdacht nicht erhärtet, oder die Behauptungen haben sich sogar als falsch herausgestellt. Konfrontiert mit diesen Erkenntnissen und auf Nachfrage auf der Bundespressekonferenz, welche konkreten Belege eigentlich für die Behauptungen vorliegen, antwortete ein Regierungssprecher lapidar:
„Wir nutzen für ein Gesamtlagebild natürlich eine vielfältige Informationsbreite. Dazu gehören auch Nachrichten und Erkenntnisse unserer Partner und unserer eigenen Quellen, die andere nicht haben. (…) Ich sehe aktuell keinen Grund, aus dem wir unsere Bewertungen der letzten Monate korrigieren müssten.“
Schlussendlich hat sich auch eine angebliche russische GPS-Störung, die zu einer verspäteten Landung von EU-Kommissionspräsidentin Ursula von der Leyen in Bulgarien geführt haben soll, als reine Zeitungsente herausgestellt. Die Aufklärungsarbeit findet dabei nicht in den etablierten Medien mit großer Reichweite statt – im Gegenteil. Dort wird jede noch so vage Behauptung einer russischen Bedrohung als Sensationsmeldung verkündet. Eine Aufarbeitung oder Korrektur der Falschmeldungen findet so gut wie nicht statt. Stattdessen erscheint das Narrativ einer „hybriden russischen Kriegsführung“ durch die ständige Wiederholung nicht bestätigter Behauptungen wie ein Fakt. Tatsächlich gibt es abseits von nicht öffentlichen Geheimdienstinformationen keinen einzigen handfesten Beleg, der die Behauptung einer hybriden russischen Kriegsführung in den Mitgliedsländern der EU rechtfertigen würde.
Behauptung Nr. 3: AfD und BSW sind rechts- beziehungsweise linksextreme Parteien – oder sogar beides zugleich
Die Einschätzung, dass die AfD als „gesichert rechtsextremistisch“ einzustufen ist, beruht auf einem Gutachten des Bundesamtes für Verfassungsschutz, das nur für den internen Dienstgebrauch bestimmt ist. Hier setzt sich das Muster fort, das schon aus der angeblichen russischen Bedrohungslage bekannt ist. Obwohl öffentlich nachvollziehbare Belege fehlen, werden die Beurteilungen von Politikern und Medien übernommen, als handele es sich dabei um einen Fakt.
So äußerte Bundeskanzler Merz Mitte 2024 im Nachgang der Europawahl im Hinblick auf die Parteien AfD und BSW:
„Wir arbeiten mit solchen rechtsextremen und linksextremen Parteien nicht zusammen. Für Frau Wagenknecht gilt ja beides. Sie ist in einigen Themen rechtsextrem und in anderen wiederum linksextrem.“
Bei einem Vergleich der Wahlprogramme zur Bundestagswahl 2025 stellt sich jedoch heraus, dass die Programme der Union und der AfD in vielen Punkten übereinstimmen. Insbesondere beim Thema Migration fällt auf, dass die im Wahlprogramm der AfD formulierten Forderungen hinsichtlich der Zuwanderung sowie der Rückführung von Migranten bei Weitem nicht so radikal sind, wie dies in den Medien überwiegend dargestellt wird. Erstaunlicherweise stimmen die diesbezüglichen Positionen der Unionsparteien im Grunde mit denen der AfD überein und sind in einigen Punkten sogar rigoroser als die der AfD. Dagegen lassen sich wesentliche Unterschiede dieser Parteien bei der Außenpolitik und der Aufarbeitung der Corona-Maßnahmen finden. Im Gegensatz zur Union stellt sich die AfD gegen eine weitere Unterstützung der Ukraine sowie gegen die Ausweitung der Sanktionen gegen Russland. Zudem ist die AfD gegen eine Aufnahme der Ukraine in die EU und die NATO.
Ähnlich verhält es sich am linken Rand des politischen Spektrums. In vielen Punkten stimmen auch die Wahlprogramme vom BSW und der Linkspartei überein. Wesentliche Unterschiede sind auch hier hauptsächlich bei der Außenpolitik zu finden. Im Gegensatz zur Linkspartei setzt sich das BSW gegen eine Ausweitung der Sanktionen gegen Russland ein. Zudem ist das BSW – anders als die Linkspartei – für eine Aufarbeitung der Corona-Maßnahmen sowie eine schärfere Migrationspolitik.
Aus den Wahlprogrammen kann man daher lediglich schließen, dass die AfD – ähnlich wie CDU und CSU – gesichert rechts und das BSW gesichert links ist. Gemessen an den Positionen zur Migration müsste man die Unionsparteien als noch rechtsextremistischer einstufen als die AfD. Dies steht im fundamentalen Widerspruch zur Darstellung in den etablierten Medien, welche die Union häufig als „konservativ“ und die AfD als „rechtsextrem“ oder wahlweise als „rechtspopulistisch“ bezeichnen.
Da man den vermeintlichen Rechtsextremismus der AfD nicht am Wahlprogramm festmachen kann, müssen die Aussagen einiger Politiker der Partei für die Einschätzung des Verfassungsschutzes herhalten. So wird das Gutachten des Bundesamtes für Verfassungsschutz in einem Bericht der Tagesschau wie folgt zitiert:
„‚Konkret betrachtet die AfD zum Beispiel deutsche Staatsangehörige mit Migrationsgeschichte aus muslimisch geprägten Ländern als nicht gleichwertige Angehörige des durch die Partei ethnisch definierten deutschen Volkes‘, heißt es in der Mitteilung des Inlandsgeheimdienstes. Zum Ausdruck komme dieses Verständnis in Äußerungen teils hochrangiger Parteimitglieder.“
Allerdings gerieten auch CDU- und SPD-Politiker in der Vergangenheit aufgrund rechtsextremer Äußerungen immer wieder in die Schlagzeilen. Einige Beispiele dazu sind im NDR, in der taz, in der Welt und im Deutschlandfunk zu finden.
Es stellt sich daher die Frage, warum der Verfassungsschutz bisher nicht auch gegen die Union und die SPD ermittelt hat. Ein Hinweis darauf lässt sich anhand der jeweiligen Parteizugehörigkeit der Präsidenten des Bundesamtes für Verfassungsschutz der letzten 30 Jahre finden: Peter Frisch (1996 – 2000), SPD, Heinz Fromm (2000 – 2012), SPD, Hans-Georg Maaßen (2012 – 2018), CDU, und Thomas Haldenwang (2018 – 2024), CDU.
Es drängt sich der Verdacht auf, dass die etablierten Parteien den deutschen Inlandsgeheimdienst missbrauchen, um die größte und bei einigen Umfrageinstituten derzeit vorne liegende Oppositionspartei zu verbieten und damit von der nächsten Bundestagswahl auszuschließen. Der eigentliche Grund für das Verbot dürfte eher in der Haltung der AfD zu Russland und dem Krieg in der Ukraine liegen als in der vorgeworfenen Rechtsextremität.
Was bringt die Zukunft?
Es bestehen begründete Befürchtungen, dass sich die europäischen Gesellschaften angesichts des derzeitigen Kurses der EU und dessen nationalen Unterstützer in den nächsten Jahren drastisch verändern werden. Eine offene, angstfreie und friedliche Haltung der EU-Länder weicht derzeit einer auf Krieg und Zensur ausgerichteten Politik. Da das Gericht der Europäischen Union bisher keiner Klage gegen die Russlandsanktionen des EU-Rates stattgegeben hat, ist zu erwarten, dass diese Entwicklung sich eher beschleunigen wird.
Spätestens dann, wenn es dazu kommen sollte, dass das Gericht auch Klagen der sanktionierten deutschen Journalisten oder des Schweizer Publizisten Jacques Baud abweist, dürften sich die Sanktionen rapide ausweiten. Selbst wenn es den Klagen stattgibt, bleibt das Instrument äußerst wirksam. Denn welche Journalisten, die eher aus Idealismus statt aufgrund der beschränkten Einkommensmöglichkeiten für regierungskritische Magazine tätig sind, können es sich schon leisten, Monate auf Gehalt zu verzichten und dann auch noch teure Anwälte zu finanzieren, die sie vor dem EU-Gerichtshof vertreten?
Titelbild: Nicoleta Ionescu/shutterstock.com
Verwandte Tags
New Delhi and Moscow just plotted a new course together. Bilateral trade will hit $100 billion by 2030, Russian energy deliveries will be “uninterrupted”, defence co-production will be expanded on Indian soil, […]
The post How the India-Russia Alliance Affects US Negotiating Power first appeared on The Expose.
