President Donald Trump declared Thursday evening, “We ended the war with Iran today,” and touted an emerging agreement that he said would permanently prevent Tehran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.
The post ‘We Ended the War’: Trump Touts Impending Iran Deal at Virtual Rally appeared first on Breitbart.
The U.S. military was fully postured and just three hours away from launching another round of strikes against Iran on Thursday when President Donald Trump abruptly halted the operation and announced that a breakthrough agreement with Tehran was nearing completion, according to a report published Thursday night.
The post Report: U.S. Military Was 3 Hours from Iran Strike Before Trump Announced Deal Breakthrough appeared first on Breitbart.
President Donald Trump announced Thursday that he has canceled planned strikes against Iran, declaring that a deal to end the conflict has been approved by all parties and is awaiting finalization.
The post Trump Cancels Strikes, Says Iran Deal ‘Approved by All Parties Involved’ appeared first on Breitbart.
New details from Iran’s top diplomat about the strike that killed Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei provide some of the clearest evidence yet of the precision and strategy behind the joint U.S.-Israeli operation that launched Operation Epic Fury, counterterrorism experts said Sunday.
The account, revealed by Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in a new television interview, also highlights what analysts describe as a defining feature of President Donald Trump’s national security doctrine: using a decapitation strike against a hostile regime while simultaneously creating an off-ramp to end the conflict.
"Well, the building we were sitting in was targeted, but the wing we were in remained intact while the other wing of the building was destroyed," Araghchi said in an interview that aired June 4 on the Lebanon-based, Hezbollah-backed Al Mayadeen television network.
While Araghchi survived the Feb. 28 strike because he was in a different wing of Khamenei's compound when the attack occurred, he went on to detail how Khamenei was in his office and how others survived.
BEFORE-AND-AFTER SATELLITE IMAGERY OFFERS A RARE LOOK AT DAMAGE INSIDE IRAN
Reviewing the original segment, counterterrorism expert Dr. Omar Mohammed told Fox News Digital that Araghchi’s account confirms the operation targeted a specific section of the complex rather than flattening the entire site.
"In the Arabic version, Araghchi says he was in a different wing of the compound, briefing another official, and his wing survived while the leader’s office was destroyed," Mohammed explained.
Araghchi also told the interviewer that he had an appointment that day with an official at the compound regarding the Geneva negotiations and that, based on the usual workflow, Khamenei "had to be present in his office."
Mohammed, director of the Antisemitism Research Initiative at the Program on Extremism at George Washington University, added that if Araghchi’s account is accurate, this was Iran's glaring acknowledgment of U.S. strategic capabilities.
"They did not flatten a building; they took one wing and left the one next to it standing. That is President Trump’s whole doctrine in a single strike — he does not want a war of occupation, he wants to show the United States can reach the center of a hostile regime with precision and then offer it a way out," Mohammed said.
DOZENS OF TOP IRANIAN REGIME OFFICIALS, SUPREME LEADER KILLED IN ISRAELI STRIKES
The daylight strike on elder Khamenei’s compound was carried out by Israeli jets targeting the site with 30 precision munitions alongside Sparrow air-launched ballistic missiles.
Military officials confirmed that a precise strike sequence killed Khamenei, 86, alongside Defense Minister Amir Nasirzadeh, IRGC Commander Mohammed Pakpour and multiple top security leaders.
Trump confirmed U.S. involvement in Khamenei’s killing in a post on social media at the time.
"He was unable to avoid our intelligence and highly sophisticated tracking systems, and, working closely with Israel, there was not a thing he or the other leaders killed alongside him could do," the president wrote.
"Iran was handed the clearest message an adversary can get — we can reach your leader in his own office, and here is the off-ramp," Mohammed noted. "A rational state takes the exit. Tehran did the opposite. It fired on Israel, killed a civilian in Bahrain, struck Kuwait, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, and closed the Strait of Hormuz, setting off a global energy crisis. The surgical strike was American. The months-long war that followed was Iran's choice."
Following the leadership transition, Ali Khamenei's son, Mojtaba Khamenei, became Iran's new supreme leader.
IRAN’S NEW SUPREME LEADER IS ‘HIS FATHER ON STEROIDS,’ EXPERTS WARN OF HARDLINE RULE
He has since been involved in back-channel discussions with the U.S. while maintaining a confrontational public stance.
"In Arabic, Araghchi calls the new leader ‘the young Khamenei in place of the elderly Khamenei.’ That is the language of a monarchy, not a republic of clerics," Mohammed observed. "They are rewriting the theology on air to fit a son who lacks the religious rank, who was wounded in the same strike and who then vanished for weeks. A revolution that came to power by ending a monarchy is handing the throne from father to son."
"The real story is not that Iran is strong," Mohammed continued. "It was shown the precision of American power and the door was held open, and it chose to widen the war instead."
Iran's supreme leader has launched a sweeping counteroffensive against President Donald Trump, attempting to rally Middle Eastern nations into an anti-American alliance, an analyst warned Sunday.
The aggressive maneuvering came hours after Trump pitched an expansion of the Abraham Accords, as an analyst said Tehran is seeking to position itself as the region’s "new sheriff" while forcing Gulf states with backchannels to Iran to choose between Washington’s security umbrella and a "New Islamic Civilization."
On Sunday, negotiations between Iran and the United States appeared to be ongoing, with Trump not yet signing off on a potential peace agreement.
Trump recently held a phone call with leaders from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Turkey, Pakistan, Egypt, Jordan and Bahrain to discuss expanding the 2020 Abraham Accords, followed by a May 25 post on Truth Social.
IRAN'S KHAMENEI LAUNCHES BLISTERING ATTACK ON TRUMP AFTER MIDDLE EAST VISIT
Mojtaba Khamenei issued a direct counter-response on X on May 26, issuing a call for a "New Islamic Civilization" aimed at those same regional capitals.
"I, with sincerity and purity of intention, invite all Islamic countries and governments to friendship and cooperation in goodness, so that by working together we may take steps toward the advancement of the Islamic Ummah and the resolution of the Islamic world's problems," Khamenei posted.
Highlighting "the nations of the region" and "common interests that will shape the new order and the future architecture of the region and the world," he spoke of "the Islamic Ummah and the #New_Islamic_Civilization."
"The United States will no longer have a safe haven for its mischief and for establishing military bases in West Asia," he also warned.
"Mojtaba Khamenei's statement is that the Muslim world should consolidate under Iran's leadership — the 'Ummah,' the 'new Islamic civilization' — against the American-led order," Dr. Omar Mohammed told Fox News Digital.
"That is the theme, and it runs straight into the Accords narrative. This is a bid to build an alliance against the Abraham Accords," said Mohammed, director of the Antisemitism Research Initiative Program on Extremism at George Washington University.
"In his statement, he also frames American bases on Muslim soil as an occupation to be expelled while wrapping it in religious language that casts the regime as God's instrument."
The counterterrorism expert noted that while the "Ummah" doctrine itself is not new — having been used by Mojtaba's father for years — the timing and targeted nature of the pitch represent a major escalation.
"This came into the Ummah with Iran, not into normalization with Israel under Washington," Mohammed explained. "Same audience, opposite frame, 24 hours apart, and a bid to assemble that alliance."
"The statement was published in full and carried by Iranian state media. It also tracks with his first statement as leader on March 12, when he demanded that U.S. bases in the region close."
"This was not a stray post," the expert warned. "While the doctrine is old, aiming it at these regions the day after Trump's pitch is what is new."
The posturing comes as Khamenei establishes his footing on the world stage, though his hidden nature complicates traditional diplomacy.
"Tehran is selling itself to the region as the new sheriff of the neighborhood," Mohammed warned.
"The Saudis, Qataris and Omanis have channels into the Iranian state, but you can't open a back channel to a man no one can locate. This has all been running through Pezeshkian and Araghchi."
Despite Iran's sudden rhetoric of "friendship," regional reality is defined by months of Iranian aggression against its neighbors.
Tehran's forces have actively fired upon Bahrain, Qatar, the UAE and Kuwait.
Mohammed added that Tehran wants to peel Gulf states away from Washington, while its threats remain aimed at both the United States and the countries that host American forces.
"Iran spent this war firing on them — it hit Bahrain, Qatar, the UAE and Kuwait, the same capitals it's now inviting to brotherhood, and the UAE alone reported intercepting close to 2,000 drones and hundreds of ballistic missiles since Feb. 28," Mohammed said.
"These are the states that host our forces: the Fifth Fleet in Bahrain, Al Dhafra in the UAE and Al Udeid in Qatar. You don't take three months of Iranian fire and then sign onto its alliance."
Ultimately, Gulf capitals remain deeply skeptical of Tehran, Mohammed said, but they are equally watchful of American resolve.
"What actually worries the Gulf isn't Mojtaba's invitation — it's the deal Washington might sign," Mohammed noted, "one that hands Iran its money back with its missiles intact and reads as rewarding the regime that just attacked them."
Iran’s supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, would have to approve any final deal with the U.S. through secret courier networks while remaining in hiding as a "designated target," counterterrorism experts said Tuesday.
The unprecedented arrangement, they claimed, means Washington is negotiating a high-stakes accord with an entirely invisible counterparty, with a potential memorandum signed by a regime leader and a marked target who can never publicly show his face.
"Khamenei is a designated target, and every confirmed sighting is a coordinate," Dr. Omar Mohammed told Fox News Digital.
"The courier system used for messaging is not transitional. It is the operating system of his rule.
IRAN'S SUPREME LEADER RUNS 'STATE WITHIN A STATE' THROUGH SECRET 4,000-PERSON NETWORK, REPORT SAYS
"Any deal the United States signs will have to be designed for a permanently invisible counterparty whose enforcement depends on his continued survival. That is not arms control as it has been conventionally understood. It is a memorandum signed under American military pressure, with a regime whose leader cannot show his face."
Mohammed’s remarks came after Secretary of State Marco Rubio explained to reporters in India why the deal was suffering delays.
"It’s just the response," Rubio said. "I mean, when you get down on some of these things, you’ve got to hear back, and it takes the Iranians — takes them a little while longer to get back," he explained.
"That is Secretary Rubio confirming the courier latency on the record," said Dr. Omar Mohammed, director of the Antisemitism Research Initiative Program on Extremism at George Washington University. "Rubio is describing a structural feature of negotiating with a supreme leader no one can locate.
"Mojtaba is in hiding, messages are moving by courier, and responses are arriving days late.
"Rubio just confirmed the symptom, and the administration is being honest about the problem. The question is whether the framework can be designed to survive it," Mohammed claimed.
Khamenei has spent nearly three months in hiding as tensions with the U.S. escalate.
He went underground as soon as a strike on Feb. 28 killed his father, amid reports that he was gravely injured.
He was struck in Operation Epic Fury — "wounded and likely disfigured," according to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. His wife and son were killed in the same strike.
"Officials at the highest levels of the Iranian government do not know where he is," Mohammed said, meaning every piece of information he receives is "dated, and his responses come with significant latency."
The remarks come as Iran and the United States continue talks aimed at reaching a deal to end the war that began Feb. 28.
IRAN'S SUPREME LEADER MOJTABA KHAMENEI 'MISFUNCTIONING,' NOT CONTROLLING REGIME: SOURCES
"If there’s going to be a deal, we’re going to have to work through that. But this is, you know, it’s either going to be a good deal or there isn’t going to be one," Rubio said Tuesday.
A senior administration official said the U.S. is prepared to ease sanctions if Iran makes major concessions on uranium enrichment. Frozen Iranian assets have also emerged as a key hurdle.
Iran said Monday that no agreement with the United States was imminent, despite progress toward a framework in talks.
Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said the focus of talks remained ending the war on all fronts, including Lebanon, and that a possible memorandum of understanding did not include specific details on managing the Strait of Hormuz.
"The real question for Washington is not how fast the framework can be signed," Mohammed added.
"It is also what enforcement looks like when the counterparty’s signature comes through a courier."
Ein Beitrag von Paul Clemente.
Vieles wiederholt sich. Vor allem das Schlimme. Oder das Peinliche. Wer hätte vermutet, dass Politiker des 21. Jahrhunderts religiöse Symbole reaktivieren, um ihre Gemetzel zu überhöhen? Und das mitten in einer laizistischen Kultur, wo Religion als Privatsache gilt. Die Kirchenaustritte steigen unerbittlich, Theologen verlassen die Diskurs-Arena. Und was der Papst sagt, interessiert lediglich, wenn er über Politik spricht.
Moderne Feldherren und ihre Schreiberlinge haben unlängst begriffen: Die optimale Begründung von Kriegen ist die Verteidigung von Freiheit und Menschenrechten. Eine tiefer gehende, metaphysische Fundierung würde nur stören.
Zugegeben: Geistige Tiefflieger wie George W. Bush schmückten ihre Bombardements noch in den Nuller-Jahren mit trivialreligiösen Slogans. Sein Meisterwerk: Die Gegenüberstellung vom grundguten Amerika und Schurkenstaaten, die auf der „Achse des Bösen“ lauerten. Da mussten selbst schärfste Satiriker passen. Vierundzwanzig Jahre später ist das Lachen verstummt. Stattdessen die bange Frage: War Bush seiner Zeit etwa voraus?
Vor einigen Wochen verbreitete US-Präsident Donald Trump eine KI-generierte Ikone. Mit ihm selbst als Jesus. Keine Frage, das war unverdünnter Bad Taste. Oder? Tatsache ist: Amerikas Hobby-Apokalyptiker wittern wieder Morgenluft. Mit christlichem Entzücken stellen sie fest: Mr. President bombt die Endzeit herbei.
In Westeuropa sorgt Trumps neuer Bellizismus für Irritation. Selbst härteste Fans räumen ein: Der ersehnte Friedenspräsident, der den Russland-Ukraine-Krieg in 24 Stunden beenden wollte, versagte nicht nur als Vermittler. Schlimmer: Er lernte selber, die Bombe zu lieben. Lediglich der AfD-Politiker Maximilian Krah bewies Mut – allerdings Mut zum Absurden. Er warnte die aufgeschreckte Partei-Horde mit dem Satz:
„Trump ist der Katechon!“
Katechon? Wer oder was ist das? Auf jeden Fall ein Begriff, der in postchristlicher Zeit kaum noch Verständnis findet. Entnommen ist er aus dem zweiten Brief des Apostels Paulus an die Gemeinde in Thessaloniki. Darin warnt er die Gläubigen vor dem Pseudo-Messias, dem getarnten Anti-Christen, dem Teufel persönlich. Der werde nämlich behaupten, dass Gottes Friedensreich längst eingetroffen sei. Eine Täuschung, zur Ausbremsung von Buße und Umkehr. In Wahrheit stehe die Apokalypse noch aus. Als Grund für ihr bisheriges Ausbleiben nennt Paulus den Katechon. Von ihm werde die Apokalypse noch aufgehalten, das große Finale noch herausgezögert. Paulus schreibt:
Das „Geheimnis der Gesetzwidrigkeit ist schon am Werk; nur muss erst der beseitigt werden, der es jetzt noch zurückhält.“
Dieser Aufhalter ist der Katechon. Eine Macht, die das Ende herauszögert.
Es blieb dem katholischen Staatsrechtler Carl Schmitt vorbehalten, das politische Potenzial des Katechon im 20. Jahrhundert zu reanimieren. Schon Ende der Zwanziger hatte Schmitt die Unterscheidung zwischen Freund und Feind zum zentralen Kriterium politischen Handelns erklärt. Ein Gegensatz, der auf Jesus versus Satan zurückgreift. Ebenso Schmitts Definition des Souveräns als jemanden, der über den Ausnahmezustand entscheidet. Und was ist mehr „Ausnahmezustand“ als die Apokalypse? Damit wäre der Katechon nicht nur Aufhalter, sondern auch wirklicher Souverän.
Zum Jahresende 1947 schrieb Schmitt:
„Ich glaube an den Katechon; er ist für mich die einzige Möglichkeit, als Christ Geschichte zu verstehen und sinnvoll zu finden.“ Freilich stellt sich die Frage, „wer ist heute der Katechon? Man kann doch nicht Churchill oder John Foster Dulles dafür halten.“ Trotzdem: „Man muss für jede Epoche der letzten 1948 Jahre den Katechon nennen können. Der Platz war niemals unbesetzt, sonst wären wir nicht mehr vorhanden.“
Und wenn es gleichzeitig an mehreren Ecken brennt? Das Problem löst sich durch Arbeitsteilung:
„Es gibt zeitweise, vorübergehende, splitterhafte fragmentarische Inhaber dieser Aufgabe.“
Laut dem Schmitt-Biographen Christian Linder wurde es für den Staatsrechtler zur Obsession, den gegenwärtigen Katechon zu finden. 1948, inmitten der Prager Unruhen, identifizierte er Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk, den ersten Staatspräsidenten der Tschechoslowakei, als
„echten europäischen Katechon.“
Kehren wir zurück in die Gegenwart, zu Maximilian Krahs Enttarnung des US-Präsidenten Trump als Katechon. Dass der Aufhalter selbst Bombenkriege führt, ist kein Einwand. Warnte Paulus nicht vor dem Fake-Messias, der falschen Frieden vorgaukelt? Natürlich steht der AfD-Politiker mit dieser Einordnung nicht allein. Noch wilder treibt es der Tech-Milliardär Peter Thiel, Geldgeber von Trump und seinem Vize J.D. Vance. Als Carl Schmitt-Leser erklärt Thiel nicht allein den US-Präsidenten, sondern die gesamte USA zum Aufhalter, zum Katechon. Als Handlanger des Antichristen identifiziert der Ultralibertäre die „Kontrollstaaten“, die Ausbremser des technologischen Fortschritts, die Befürworter des Sozialstaats, die Klima-Aktivisten und KI-Skeptiker. Vor wenigen Tagen hat der Historiker Volker Weiß das Buch „Katechon: Zur Wiederkehr der politischen Theologie in der Gegenwart“ publiziert. Darin werden noch weitere Kandidaten erwähnt.
Aber die Katechon-Debatte blüht nicht nur in westlichen Gefilden. Der Eurasien-Ideologe Alexander Dugin hat bereits 2014 einen Thinktank namens „Katechon“ gegründet. In seinen Geschichts-Szenarien sind die Rollen allerdings konträr verteilt. Dugin, ein altorthodoxer Christ, identifiziert den Westen als Antichristen. Dessen moralische Dekadenz führe schnellstmöglich zum Weltuntergang. Russland hingegen erfülle den Job des Aufhalters. Und das nicht erst im 21. Jahrhundert.
Bereits in der Sowjet-Zeit habe Russland die Funktion des „roten Katechons“ gehabt. O-Ton Dugin:
„Wir sind der letzte Aufhalter, der Katechon“. Denn: „Wir alleine leisten dem globalen Bösen Widerstand.“ Sollte dieser Widerstand erfolgreich sein, steht dem Happy End nichts mehr im Wege: „Wir kämpfen gegen den Antichristen, das muss gesagt werden. Das ist unsere russische Idee und sie wird alles richten.“
Aber nicht nur Russland ist für Dugin der Aufhalter. Auch iranische Revolutionsführer wie Ali Khamenei oder sein Sohn und Nachfolger Modschtaba Chamenei erfahren metaphysische Eingemeindung. Nach Beginn der US-Angriffe auf den Iran rief Dugin die schiitische Theokratie zum Katechon aus, da sie unter anderem via Kopftuchzwang verhindere, dass die Iranerin sich zur „Hure Babylon“ verwandelt.
Fazit: Konservative in Ost und West adaptieren zwar das Katechon-Modell, aber mit konträrer Besetzung. Ein weiterer Beweis für die Biegsamkeit von Symbolen. Seine Wiederentdeckung in christlichen oder ehemals christlichen Staaten ist kaum Zufall. Denn das christliche Geschichtsmodell, wo am Ende der große Knall steht, ist bis zur Gegenwart lebendig – selbst ohne Glaubensinhalte.
Fast jede Krise, jeder bewaffnete Konflikt, jeglicher Anstieg der Temperaturen oder mittelprächtige Laborviren: Alles wird zum Weltuntergangs-Szenario hochgerechnet. Darunter läuft nichts. Vielleicht ist diese Hassliebe zur Apokalypse, diese ängstliche Wollust zugleich ein Verdrängen? Denn schlimmer als den Großen Knall sind manche Prognosen der Astronomen. Darunter die Big Freeze-Theorie: Danach expandiert das Universum endlos weiter. Nach Billionen Jahren verlöschen alle Sterne, und die Materie zerfällt, Das Universum wird immer dünner und kälter. Ein endloses Weiter, ohne Sinn und Zweck. Eine Absurdität ohnegleichen. Kaum zu ertragen. Allerdings:
Für die Apologie eines Krieges taugt die Big Freeze-Theorie garantiert nicht.
+++
Dank an den Autor für das Recht zur Veröffentlichung des Beitrags.
+++
Bild: Gottes Arme sind in wallendes Gewand gekleidet und von hinten beleuchtet. Hintergrund des himmlischen Himmels in der Nacht mit weich leuchtenden Sternen
Bildquelle: Shutterstock AI / Shutterstock
Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei has spent nearly three months in hiding as tensions with the U.S. escalate — a disappearance that counterterrorism analysts say mirrors the final years of al Qaeda mastermind Osama bin Laden.
The comparison comes amid a critical standoff between Washington and Tehran that prompted President Donald Trump to pause a planned strike on May 19. On Wednesday, Trump told reporters he was in "no hurry."
Khamenei, meanwhile, appeared to share three posts on his official X account on May 18 but remains out of public view.
"For the first time in the history of the Islamic Republic, the United States has done to Tehran what it spent two decades doing to al-Qaeda and ISIS," counterterrorism expert Dr. Omar Mohammed told Fox News Digital.
"The U.S. has driven its leader into the same kind of operational invisibility that bin Laden lived in for 10 years in Abbottabad," he added.
"Both Mojtaba Khamenei and bin Laden inherited their status on the back of an American operation, and both responded the same way: by ceasing to exist publicly," Mohammed said before adding that bin Laden "stopped releasing dated videos around 2007 and confined himself to audio messages carried by hand."
Bin Laden founded al-Qaeda in the late 1980s and masterminded the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks against the United States.
After the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan, bin Laden evaded capture for a decade by hiding inside a fortified compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan.
To avoid Western electronic surveillance, he severed his digital footprint and relied exclusively on a network of physical couriers, said Mohammed, an expert with the Antisemitism Research Initiative at George Washington University’s Program on Extremism.
U.S. intelligence eventually tracked one of those couriers to the compound, culminating in the 2011 Navy SEAL raid that killed the al Qaeda leader.
OPERATION EPIC FURY: HOW AMERICA'S AIR POWER IS CRUSHING IRAN’S TERROR REGIME
"Bin Laden survived with no cables out of the Abbottabad compound. Communications were carried by hand by two trusted couriers, the Kuwaiti brothers," Mohammed said.
"Bin Laden stayed hidden for the rest of his life because the moment he surfaced was the moment he died. Mojtaba’s incentives point the same way. Mojtaba Khamenei won’t emerge," he said.
"The Abbottabad lesson, which Tehran will have studied closely, is that the safest hiding place is not a cave in Tora Bora but a walled compound in a garrison town," Mohammed added, recalling how U.S. forces targeted bin Laden in the cave complex before he escaped.
Bin Laden also lived roughly a mile from Pakistan’s top military academy, hiding in plain sight behind high concrete walls and barbed wire, Mohammed noted.
"The logical Iranian equivalents are hardened sites under or alongside IRGC facilities," Mohammed added, referring to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and possible locations where Khamenei could be.
As previously reported by Fox News Digital, one of Khamenei’s few recent communications was an X post declaring a "holy war," framing the geopolitical clash as a mandatory religious obligation.
INSIDE IRAN’S RULING IDEOLOGY: HOW A ‘HOLY MISSION’ AND MESSIANIC DOCTRINE FUEL REGIME EXTREMISM
"This is a religious leader calling for sacred war against America and the Jews from an undisclosed location because his enemies have publicly vowed to kill him on sight," Mohammed said, describing the narrative as "the bin Laden template, almost line for line."
Mohammed also suggested Khamenei’s retreat into the shadows marks a watershed moment for Washington and the future of the Iranian regime.
His predecessor and father, Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was killed Feb. 28 in a targeted U.S.-Israeli airstrike in Tehran during Operation Epic Fury.
"This regime that for 47 years projected its power through a single visible Supreme Leader at the Friday prayer pulpit can no longer produce that figure on demand," he said, calling it a "strategic milestone."
"Predecessors killed by U.S. strikes and successors who cannot show their faces. Real power exercised by a security apparatus rather than by the nominal figurehead."
"Now one side is announcing operations on three continents through its president; the other is governed on paper by a man whose own population is uncertain where he is or what state he is in," Mohammed said.
"The contrast is also about the optics of leadership during this war," he added.
The apparent collapse of high-stakes U.S.-Iran negotiations has intensified fears that senior figures inside Tehran’s leadership could flee to Russia, seeking refuge to "continue their insurgency and undermine any new regime," an analyst warns.
The breakdown in talks comes as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also told CBS’ "60 Minutes" that toppling Iran’s regime could now even be a realistic outcome.
Netanyahu noted that any collapse would dismantle the "scaffolding" of Tehran's global terror proxy network, also potentially ending Hezbollah's influence in the region.
"The whole scaffolding of the terrorist proxy network that Iran built collapses if the regime in Iran collapses," Netanyahu said.
HERE’S WHAT A POST-AYATOLLAH IRAN COULD LOOK LIKE IF WAR WITH ISRAEL LEADS TO REGIME’S FALL
"I think you can’t predict when that will happen. Is it possible? Yes. Is it guaranteed? No," he warned.
With diplomatic options perhaps exhausted and the regime's stability in question, an expert suggests the exit strategy any leadership may be eyeing might be similar to that of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, who fled Syria in 2024.
"If the situation deteriorates further, some senior figures could potentially follow a path like Bashar al-Assad’s inner circle and seek refuge in Russia," Middle East expert Saeid Golkar told Fox News Digital.
IRANIAN REGIME ELITES ALLEGEDLY MOVE MILLIONS OF DOLLARS OUT OF COUNTRY AMID SANCTIONS
Golkar, a senior adviser at United Against Nuclear Iran, noted that flight destinations would likely depend on rank.
While top commanders like Parliament Speaker Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf might head to Moscow, lower-ranking figures would more likely seek shelter in Iraq or Afghanistan, where the IRGC maintains operational connections, he clarified.
"For the most senior figures, Russia would probably be the most likely destination, again as we saw with Bashar al-Assad," Golkar said, noting many officials have already moved wealth into "financial networks outside Iran."
The current crisis started following the death of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei earlier in 2026 during the onset of Operation Epic Fury.
While his son, Mojtaba Khamenei, was named successor, reports continue to indicate he was severely injured in the strikes and has been absent from recent negotiations.
INSIDE IRAN’S RULING IDEOLOGY: HOW A ‘HOLY MISSION’ AND MESSIANIC DOCTRINE FUEL REGIME EXTREMISM
Golkar explained that the "invisible state," or Bayt-e Rahbari, was designed to survive decapitation, while the ideological cost of fleeing for leaders would be high.
"Inside the regime’s ideological culture, leaving the country during the collapse would look like desertion," Golkar noted.
However, as military fractures deepen and succession remains uncertain, the "Assad model" of seeking Russian protection appears increasingly attractive to those at the top.
Mojtaba, however, is "either dead or in bad condition that he cannot send any video or voice message," Golkar added.
"If he had died from his injuries, there was no clear natural successor. He was the continuation of the regime."
"Still, the system was designed for continuity during a crisis," Golkar said, adding that the goal is to "make sure the regime could survive even if formal institutions were damaged, leaders were killed, or civilian government stopped functioning."
"I would describe it as a regime designed not just to govern, but always to try and survive decapitation," Golkar added.
North Korea has updated its constitution to require a retaliatory nuclear strike if leader Kim Jong Un is assassinated, according to a report.
The Telegraph reported the change comes amid heightened global tensions following the killing of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and other officials during a recent conflict.
Khamenei was killed in an Israeli strike in Tehran as part of a coordinated U.S.-Israeli military operation earlier this year, Fox News Digital previously reported.
The constitutional revision was approved during a session of North Korea’s Supreme People’s Assembly, which opened March 22 in Pyongyang, the outlet said.
ISRAEL TARGETS IRAN’S SUPREME LEADER IN SWEEPING STRIKES AS US JOINS ‘OPERATION EPIC FURY’
South Korea’s National Intelligence Service (NIS) briefed senior government officials this week on the update, according to the report.
The revised policy outlines procedures for retaliatory action if North Korea’s leadership is incapacitated or killed.
"If the command-and-control system over the state’s nuclear forces is placed in danger by hostile forces’ attacks … a nuclear strike shall be launched automatically and immediately," the updated provision states.
KIM JONG UN CALLS SOUTH KOREA ‘MOST HOSTILE ENEMY,’ SAYS NORTH COULD ‘COMPLETELY DESTROY’ IT
Reuters previously reported that North Korea revised its constitution to define its territory as bordering South Korea and remove references to reunification, reflecting Kim’s push to formally treat the two Koreas as separate states.
That marked the first time North Korea included a territorial clause in its constitution.
Last month, Kim pledged to further strengthen the country’s nuclear capabilities while maintaining a hard-line stance toward South Korea, which he has called the "most hostile" state.
Kim has also accused the United States of "state terrorism and aggression," and signaled North Korea could take a more active role in opposition to Washington amid rising global tensions.
Fox News Digital's Alex Nitzberg and The Associated Press contributed to this report.
